The Spread of Farming in Sub-Saharan Africa: Bantu Migration

By Tony Maccarella
Humans perfected foraging in Africa, but many turned to farming when the right tools, and the right crops, became available.

Cookie Policy

Our website uses cookies to understand content and feature usage to drive site improvements over time. To learn more, review our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Painting of a farming village. Villagers do various types of work: some are tending to their crops, and children are playing a game. There are several living structures behind a stone wall.

Connections across a wide region

A sculpted artwork of the head of a figure, featuring elaborate carvings
The Lynderburg head, one of several sculptures from early Bantu-speaking peoples in southern Africa. The decorative motifs show a great continuity with Bantu figures and decorations across large areas of Africa. By Rexford Nkansah, African Center, Cape Town, CC BY 3.0.

The migration of the Bantu people is an interesting story. It is part of the history of agriculture. The Bantu moved across the sub-Saharan regions of Africa.

Early Bantu history was passed through oral tradition. Researchers have found other ways to learn about the Bantu. They have also found that the Bantu moved across Africa. This migration began possibly as early as 2000 BCE.

There was a large Bantu network by 1200 CE. It cut across the trunk (middle) of Africa. Bantu expansion reached almost all the way to the southern tip of the continent. The expansion led to trade and shared technology.

The agricultural revolution in much of Afro-Eurasia began around 8,000 to 10,000 years ago. Sub- Saharan Africa was later in adopting agriculture. It may have begun in modern-day Cameroon in 7000 BCE. Originally this was home to Bantu-speaking people. However, foraging was the main food source in the rest of sub-Saharan Africa until 2000 BCE.

Archaeologists have unearthed pottery, iron tools, and settlements in Bantu homelands. These are all evidence of agriculture. These artifacts date to between 2000 BCE and 1000 CE. Iron and pottery spread in the same areas the Bantu did. How did these technologies move across the continent? 

Two maps. Bantu language group shown on a map of the African continent. Bantu languages are shown to cover a large part of the African continent (left). Arrows on a map show the ways the Bantu languages spread (right).
The Bantu language group is made up of about 500 related languages. It stretches across much of central and southern Africa today. By WHP, CC BY-NC 4.0. (left) The spread of Bantu languages, people, and technology, according to DNA, linguistic, and archaeological evidence. But how did this package spread? Migration, diffusion, or adoption? By WHP, CC BY-NC 4.0. (right)

Evidence from different academic disciplines

There are many maps of the Bantu migrations. They mostly look similar to the one above. Some show different migration patterns. It is hard to know which is correct. There are different types of evidence showing where the Bantu went. This evidence comes from different types of sources.

Archaeology is one source of evidence. Archaeologists have discovered potsherds (bits of broken pottery) in Cameroon. Ancient pottery is a major source of evidence about agricultural societies. It proves the idea that sub- Saharan farming started there. Pottery in other places shows where the Bantu spread.

Another source is the study of languages. Linguists (language experts) look at modern Bantu-based languages. They trace the development of Bantu languages. This shows where the Bantu people moved.

DNA evidence is also used. Scientists collect the DNA of modern Bantu language speakers. They compare it to the DNA of original Bantus.

These three types of sources all reached the same conclusions. The Bantu began in west Africa. They moved south and east across Africa. They moved between 2000 BCE and 1000 CE. 

Theories about the Bantu migration

How did the Bantu network come into being? There are different theories. It could have been formed by the Bantu people physically moving (migration). It could also have been that their ideas spread to other peoples through diffusion or adoption. There are disputes about which is correct. Different types of evidence may say different things.
 

Migration theory

Diffusion theory

Adoption theory

Large groups of people moved, in waves, from the Bantu homeland in West Africa. They brought with them technologies that allowed them to open up and cultivate land that had been forest, rocky soil, or swamp—iron, crops, pottery, and cattle being chief among them. That allowed them to claim this territory and displace or assimilate with the foragers who lived there beforehand.

Bantu-speakers in West Africa moved into new areas in very small groups, usually just families. But they brought with them the Bantu technology and language package—iron, crops, cattle, pottery, and more. These pioneers then shared their more advanced technologies (and, in the process, their languages) with the locals. These locals as a result began speaking their languages as well as living lifestyles that were more like the Bantu-speakers.

Bantu language and technology moved while the people largely stayed put. Neighbors of Bantu-speakers adopted some of their technologies such as iron, pottery, cattle, and crops, but rejected others. The next group of people then saw their neighbors had adopted some of these technologies, and they chose the ones that suited them as well. Their languages changed in the process because they adopted the words for these technologies. But the people making the change were generally not migrants, but rather locals!

Table 1: Theories about the Bantu Migration

More questions to answer

There is still more to learn about the agricultural revolution in sub-Saharan Africa. Why did the Bantu move? They must have had a reason. It could have been because they needed better resources. There could have been a change in climate.

Some facts seem certain. Farming began near Cameroon between 5000 and 2000 BCE. Beyond that, researchers can only debate. Perhaps they will one day reach a single conclusion. It could explain the spread of agriculture and language across Africa.

Sources

De Filippo, C., K. Bostoen, M. Stoneking, and B. Pakendorf. “Bringing together linguistic and genetic evidence to test the Bantu expansion.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B 279, no. 1741 (2012): 3256-63.

Huffman, Thomas N. Handbook to the Iron Age: The Archaeology of Pre-colonial Farming Societies in Southern Africa. Scottsville, South Africa: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press, 2007.

Rexová, K., Y. Bastin, and D. Frynta. “Cladistic analysis of Bantu languages: A new tree based on combined lexical and grammatical data.” Naturwissenschaften 93, no. 4 (2006): 189-94.

“The Story of Africa: Early History.” BBC. Accessed November 11, 2019. http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/africa/features/ storyofafrica/2chapter5.shtml

Tony Maccarella

Tony Maccarella holds a Masters degree in Curriculum and Instruction and has been teaching history since 1982. He has served as an AP European History Reader and Table Leader since 2002, and has published several books for improving research and writing skills in AP history classes. Tony currently teaches history at Saddle River Day School where he also serves as the Head of Upper School.

Image credits

Creative Commons This work is licensed under CC BY 4.0 except for the following:

Cover: Settlement of the Engaruka poeple, Northern Tanzania, c. 15th century © Tony Smith / Getty Images

The Lynderburg head, one of several sculptures from early Bantu-speaking peoples in southern Africa. The decorative motifs show a great continuity with Bantu figures and decorations across large areas of Africa. By Rexford Nkansah, African Center, Cape Town, CC BY 3.0. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Iziko_Lydenburg_Heads_2.JPG

Maps by WHP and George Chakvetadze, Alliance USA, LLC, CC BY-NC 4.0.


Newsela

Articles leveled by Newsela have been adjusted along several dimensions of text complexity including sentence structure, vocabulary and organization. The number followed by L indicates the Lexile measure of the article. For more information on Lexile measures and how they correspond to grade levels: www.lexile.com/educators/understanding-lexile-measures/

To learn more about Newsela, visit www.newsela.com/about.

The Lexile Framework for Reading

The Lexile® Framework for Reading evaluates reading ability and text complexity on the same developmental scale. Unlike other measurement systems, the Lexile Framework determines reading ability based on actual assessments, rather than generalized age or grade levels. Recognized as the standard for matching readers with texts, tens of millions of students worldwide receive a Lexile measure that helps them find targeted readings from the more than 100 million articles, books and websites that have been measured. Lexile measures connect learners of all ages with resources at the right level of challenge and monitors their progress toward state and national proficiency standards. More information about the Lexile® Framework can be found at www.Lexile.com.