Race and Post-Abolition Societies
The never-ending end of slavery
It took almost 200 years to end slavery around the world. Passage of the Thirteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in December 1865 was one key step. The amendment ended slavery in the United States.
However, other key moments must also be considered. These include:
- The 1794 French law that made France the first modern empire to outlaw slavery.
- The 1838 freeing of enslaved people in the British Caribbean.
- The much more recent 1981 banning of slavery in Mauritania, a West African nation. Mauritania was the last country in the world to end slavery.
The path to freedom was different in each society. In all places, newly freed people did not win immediate equality with other groups.
Abolition and the Haitian Revolution
In 1791 France was experiencing a revolution. French citizens had risen up to end the monarchy. A monarchy is a form of government where a King or Queen is the ruler.
Also in 1791, there was a major revolt of enslaved people in the French Caribbean colony of Saint Domingue. Colonialism is when one country takes control over another place. The colonizer then takes advantage of its people and resources.
This revolt was successful. It led to the creation of the independent Republic of Haiti in 1804. It was the first place in the modern world where slaves ended slavery. The leaders of Western nations like Britain, France, and the United States were not happy with this development. They feared that enslaved people elsewhere would follow the example of Haiti and rise up too. As a result, Haiti was cut off from the international trade that would have helped its economy develop. Haitians were forced to struggle to survive. Many lived in extreme poverty. Formerly enslaved Haitians had won their freedom, but they had not gained respect from the rest of the world. Haiti was even invaded and taken over by the United States in 1915.
Abolition with compensation in the British Caribbean
Abolition in the British empire, and especially its Caribbean colonies, was not the result of war. It was the result of the pressure British Christians — both Black and white — placed on their government. These men and women managed to convince the British public that ending slavery was the right thing to do.
In 1833 the British Parliament passed a law abolishing slavery in Britain’s colonies. The British government paid former enslavers for the loss of their “property.” However, no such payment was considered for freed people, despite the years of free labor they had provided. They now had to fend for themselves. Most had no education and no money. In most British colonies, land and jobs were scarce. As a result, most of the formerly enslaved still had to work on plantations. Planters paid them barely enough to survive. And unlike Haiti, where both slavery and colonial rule were overthrown, these societies remained under British control well into the 1900s.
Abolition, government aid, and violence in the U.S.
The original purpose of the U.S. Civil War was not to end slavery. Yet, that was one of its results. The process began when enslaved people freed themselves by running away during the confusion of war.
The war was between the northern and southern states. The northern states who were against slavery were referred to as the Union. The southern states that were in favor of keeping slavery were called the Confederates.
Northern Union forces encouraged enslaved people to run away, in order to weaken the Confederacy. Full legal freedom did not come until months after the war ended. In December 1865, the Thirteenth Amendment was added to the Constitution. It outlawed slavery throughout the United States.
In the South, the formerly enslaved still faced enormous racial hatred from white people after the war. During the Reconstruction period (1865–1877), federal forces provided some protection. For example, federal officials built schools for freed people. They helped them understand paid labor contracts and guarded their voting rights. This help was limited, but it was more than what was offered in other slave societies. In those places, freed people received no help whatsoever.
However, with the end of Reconstruction in 1877, things got much worse for the formerly enslaved. Local southern governments introduced a set of new laws known as “Jim Crow” laws. These laws limited Black Americans’ freedom and controlled their labor. Pay for Black American workers remained very low. Many Black Americans were jailed for the smallest reasons and then sent to prison labor camps.
White society kept Black Americans under near constant watch. Police, bosses, and the general population all played a part in this system. Methods of controlling Black Americans also took more violent forms. Murder and killings carried out by mobs in public were commonly used to create fear and ensure submission. A mob is a large crowd of people, and sometimes is intent on causing trouble or violence.
State and local governments in the American South also blocked Black Americans from voting or running for public office. As a result, Black people had little political power to bring about change.
Later African abolition
Abolition also took place in other areas of the world. On the African continent, slavery had become more common during the time of the Atlantic slave trade. It had then expanded in the 1800s as big plantations developed. The abolition of slavery came mostly as the result of outside forces. European companies and the European leaders of African colonies concluded that enslaving Africans on their own soil was too difficult and expensive. They realized it would be more profitable to simply rely on low-wage workers. So, they outlawed slavery. However, it remained a common practice in many parts of Africa. Even after its independence from France in 1960, the African nation Mauritania did not fully outlaw slavery until 1981.
Common patterns
For the formerly enslaved around the world, freedom simply meant the legal end of slavery. It was a necessary first step toward inclusion in their various societies. However, freedom did not bring equality. Newly freed people did not gain the rights available to the other members of their communities. They entered freedom with nothing, and usually struggled just to survive. In many places, life didn’t change that much for formerly enslaved people.
The formerly enslaved and their descendants had to keep on fighting for equality long after the legal abolition of slavery. In many parts of the world, that fight continues today.
Sources
“The Thirteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.” National Geographic Society. https://www.nationalgeographic.org/ encyclopedia/13th-amendment-united-states-constitution/
Forde, Kathy Roberts and Bryan Bowman. “Exploiting Black Labor after the Abolition of Slavery.” The Conversation, February 8, 2017. https://theconversation.com/exploiting-black-labor-after-the-abolition-of-slavery-72482
Kym Morrison
Karen Y. Morrison, “Kym,” is a social historian of Latin America and the African diaspora. She teaches at San Francisco State University and has published in Cuban Studies/Estudios Cubanos, the Journal of Social History, Abolition & Slavery, the Encyclopedia of the Modern World, and in the anthology, Africans to Spanish America. Her first book was Cuba’s Racial Crucible: The Sexual Economy of Social Identities, 1750-2000 (2015). She was a Fulbright Research Scholar in Brazil for the 2015-2016 academic year. There Professor Morrison has begun a second book project, which explores the connections between Black pride, racial hybridity, and whitening in post-abolition Rio de Janeiro.
Image credits
This work is licensed under CC BY 4.0 except for the following:
Cover image: A large group of African American male laborers in striped prison uniforms stand in a cleared wooded area, among mounds of dirt and shovels, with finely dressed Caucasian men overseeing their labor, 1909. © JHU Sheridan Libraries/ Gado/Getty Images.
A depiction of the French practice of mass drownings during the Haitian Revolution. From the Library of Congress, fair use. https://www.loc.gov/item/2006685881/
A cartoon from 1980 shows US Coast Guard officers telling Haitian refugees drifting in a small boat they are the wrong kind of huddled masses. From the Library of Congress, fair use. https://www.loc.gov/item/2020631626/
African-American child “convicts” in the post-abolition period. From the Library of Congress, public domain. https://www.loc.gov/pictures/resource/det.4a28370/
Articles leveled by Newsela have been adjusted along several dimensions of text complexity including sentence structure, vocabulary and organization. The number followed by L indicates the Lexile measure of the article. For more information on Lexile measures and how they correspond to grade levels: www.lexile.com/educators/understanding-lexile-measures/
To learn more about Newsela, visit www.newsela.com/about.
The Lexile® Framework for Reading evaluates reading ability and text complexity on the same developmental scale. Unlike other measurement systems, the Lexile Framework determines reading ability based on actual assessments, rather than generalized age or grade levels. Recognized as the standard for matching readers with texts, tens of millions of students worldwide receive a Lexile measure that helps them find targeted readings from the more than 100 million articles, books and websites that have been measured. Lexile measures connect learners of all ages with resources at the right level of challenge and monitors their progress toward state and national proficiency standards. More information about the Lexile® Framework can be found at www.Lexile.com.