The Berlin Conference

By Trevor Getz
The Berlin Conference gathered a bunch of Europeans to plot ways to divide up Africa. It may not have been the “start” of colonialism, but it sure accelerated the process.
Painting of an ornate room full of men wearing military uniforms conversing and shaking hands.

A picture worth 1000 words

They say a picture is worth a thousand words. Look below and you’ll understand the Berlin conference of 1884– 1885 as if you had just read several screens of text. All of the elements are there. It was a conference about Africa, but happening in a room in Berlin, Germany. There were zero Africans, and only two of the attendees had ever stepped foot on that continent—which is about three times larger than Europe. Instead, it was a bunch of European men representing twelve countries in Europe, plus an American representative and one from the Ottoman Empire. The room was dominated by a gigantic map of Africa. Why? Because the job the men at the conference had taken upon themselves was to divide up Africa between their respective countries.

Drawing of a room full of men, most seated at a long table, talking and looking over papers.
The Berlin Conference, November 1884 to February 1885, Germany. © Getty Images.

Leopold’s big swindle

The immediate reason for the Berlin Conference was the jealousy of the king of a small country, Belgium, towards his cousin, Queen Victoria of Great Britain. King Leopold II of Belgium considered himself to be an important man. Yet in the 1870s, Leopold had no territory other than the small state of Belgium itself. His cousin, Queen Victoria, on the other hand, was not only Queen of Great Britain but also Empress of India and had a whole empire besides.

So, Leopold set out to get himself an empire. To do that, he swindled his fellow Europeans, and also a lot of Africans. Leopold pretended to be a great humanitarian and an abolitionist. He claimed a huge territory in Central Africa, and called it the “Congo Free State,” declaring that he would allow free trade and also eliminate slavery there. Instead, he set about building a state that would work the local population mercilessly for his own profit.

Although Leopold managed to confuse most Europeans for a while, his fellow rulers gradually caught on to his trick. The French immediately sent out expeditions to claim the territory to the north. Meanwhile, the British convinced their old ally, Portugal, to expand their claims to the territory to the south, Angola, in order to block Leopold.

Illustration of the Belgian Congo in 1896, with several shaded areas.
Map of the “Belgian Congo,” which began as the “Congo Free State,” King Leopold II’s personal territory. Note Portuguese Angola to the south and French Equatorial Africa to the north. © Getty Images.

This race for control in the Congo region was just one of many that were happening in the 1880s as Europeans turned their attention and efforts to violently conquering African societies. Soon they were edging toward fights with each other. The German Chancellor, Otto von Bismarck, saw these potential conflicts as threating his plans for Europe. It was for this reason that he invited European leaders to come to Berlin in 1884 to work out a policy for their expansion on the African continent.

The Conference

The Berlin Conference took about three and a half months, from November 15, 1884, to February 26, 1885. It resulted in an act that did three things. The first was to recognize the territory that King Leopold claimed as his private property. The second was to recognize some existing territorial claims in different parts of Africa.

The third, and most important, result of the conference was to set up a way for Europeans to claim and annex territory in Africa. This process was essentially to have three steps in itself. First, European countries would send out explorers. These explorers would sign treaties with local leaders who would accept the “protection” of the European state. Second, the explorers would head home to Europe, where they would submit the treaty to their governments. Third, the government of each European country would negotiate with the other European states to have them recognize that this “protection” really meant that they now owned that territory.

Like Leopold’s initial swindle, this was all a gigantic scam, really. For starters, those treaties were often meaningless. They were usually printed in English or French, and often the local leaders didn’t know what they said. Sometimes, the explorers would get just about anyone to sign the treaty, including leaders who didn’t really have the power or authority to sign them. Finally, the whole thing was based on a racist idea—that all of this land was “unclaimed,” and that local societies could not simply rule themselves.

Menelik in the middle

An elaborately dressed Emperor of Ethiopia, Menelik II with government dignitaries in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Menelik II, Emperor of Ethiopia. Photo from L’Illustrazione Italiana, XXXVI, no. 7, February 14, 1909. © Getty Images.

One African leader who figured this out early was Menelik II, future Emperor of Ethiopia. In 1884, Menelik was not yet emperor but was an important leader of this state. He knew about the conference, although neither he nor any other African leader had been invited.

Menelik decided to write a letter to the European states at the conference, in which he asked them to take Ethiopia seriously as a military and political power. He wrote, “I have no intention at all of being an indifferent spectator, if the distant Powers hold onto the idea of dividing up Africa… Since the All- Powerful has protected Ethiopia up until now, I am hopeful that he will keep and enlarge it also in the future, and I do not think for a moment that He [God] will divide Ethiopia among the other Powers.”1

Some historians have argued that Menelik was in an interesting position. On the one hand, Ethiopia was a powerful state that was looking to build an empire of its own in the surrounding territory. On the other hand, they knew that Europeans were dividing up the continent and they feared being divided themselves. The Ethiopians could clearly see that Italy, Britain, and France all wanted to reach the nearby headwaters of the Nile River and to claim that territory—but Ethiopian leaders dreamed of claiming that territory for themselves.

In the end, Menelik’s letter was largely ignored, and though Ethiopia escaped “protection,” the Europeans went about chopping up the rest of the continent among themselves.  

Continuity and change

How important was the Berlin Conference? To what degree did it lead to change, including the colonization of Africa? Historians and legal scholars who study this question don’t all agree on an answer. Look at the two maps below and you can see different ways to answer the question.

Two maps side by side of the African continent. The map on the left reads 1880 and has many small territories and lots of grey space. The map on the right has several large territories with straight borders covering the entire continent.
Africa, 1871 (prior to the conference) and 1914 (post conference). Note that in the 1871 map, European nations controlled just a few regions along the coast, but by 1914, European nations controlled all of Africa except Liberia and Ethiopia. © OER Project.

On the one hand, the map on the left shows that many regions of Africa had already been claimed by Europeans by 1880, four years before the conference even began. In North Africa, you will see that France had conquered Algeria. Although not entirely clear, Italy was already partially controlling Libya and Britain had a great deal of power over Egypt. In the West, you will see small colonies like French Senegal and British Gold Coast and Sierra Leone. In southern Africa, you will see the Portuguese territories of Angola and Mozambique. Even further south is the Cape Colony, ruled by Britain. So, one could say that lots of colonization was already happening prior to the Berlin Conference of 1884–1885.

Yet these colonies were still quite small. Contrast this with the map of Africa in 1913, two decades after the conference. In this second map, all of Africa’s nearly twelve million square miles is colonized by European states, except for Ethiopia and the tiny state of Liberia. So clearly this vast territory was acquired following the conference.

One thing is clear—the Berlin Conference established the legal claim by Europeans that all of Africa could be occupied by whomever could take it. It also established a process for Europeans to cooperate rather than fight with each other. This cooperation played a huge role in the division and conquest of Africa. It was a form of legal violence practiced upon the whole continent and all of its people. It is for this reason that we tend to see the Berlin Conference as a significant event in world history.

 


1  A. Adu Boahen, African Perspectives on Colonialism, (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989), 25.

Sources

Bragg, Melvyn. “The Berlin Conference.” Produced by BBC4. In Our Time. October 31, 2013. Podcast, MP3 audio, 42:00. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b03ffkfd

Boahen, A. Adu. African Perspectives on Colonialism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989.

Mackenzie, John. The Partition of Africa: And European Imperialism 1880–1900. New York: Routledge, 1983.

Trevor Getz

Trevor Getz is a professor of African and world history at San Francisco State University. He has been the author or editor of 11 books, including the award-winning graphic history Abina and the Important Men, and has coproduced several prize-winning documentaries. Trevor is also the author of A Primer for Teaching African History, which explores questions about how we should teach the history of Africa in high school and university classes.

Image credits

Creative Commons This work is licensed under CC BY 4.0 except for the following:

Cover image: Congress of Berlin, 13 July 1878, after the painting by Anton von Werner. © Stefano Bianchetti/Corbis via Getty Images.

The Berlin Conference, November 1884 to February 1885, Germany. © Photo12/UIG/Getty Images.

Map of the “Belgian Congo,” which began as the “Congo Free State,” King Leopold II’s personal territory. Note Portuguese Angola to the south and French Equatorial Africa to the north. Illustration by J Lebegue, 1896. ©Buyenlarge/Getty Images.

Menelik II, Emperor of Ethiopia. Photo from L’Illustrazione Italiana, XXXVI, no. 7, February 14, 1909. ©DEA/Biblioteca Ambrosiana/Getty Images.

Africa, 1871 (prior to the conference) and 1914 (post conference). Note that in the 1871 map, European nations controlled just a few regions along the coast, but by 1914, European nations controlled all of Africa except Liberia and Ethiopia. © OER Project.


Newsela

Articles leveled by Newsela have been adjusted along several dimensions of text complexity including sentence structure, vocabulary and organization. The number followed by L indicates the Lexile measure of the article. For more information on Lexile measures and how they correspond to grade levels: www.lexile.com/educators/understanding-lexile-measures/

To learn more about Newsela, visit www.newsela.com/about.

The Lexile Framework for Reading

The Lexile® Framework for Reading evaluates reading ability and text complexity on the same developmental scale. Unlike other measurement systems, the Lexile Framework determines reading ability based on actual assessments, rather than generalized age or grade levels. Recognized as the standard for matching readers with texts, tens of millions of students worldwide receive a Lexile measure that helps them find targeted readings from the more than 100 million articles, books and websites that have been measured. Lexile measures connect learners of all ages with resources at the right level of challenge and monitors their progress toward state and national proficiency standards. More information about the Lexile® Framework can be found at www.Lexile.com.