Regional Trade Networks
Where’d you get that shirt?
Look at the tag in your shirt. Where was it made? There is a good chance it came from another country. Today, global trade is common. Long ago, though, it was a big challenge with big rewards. Trade networks spread rapidly in this era. Traders across ancient Afro-Eurasia and Mesoamerica carried new goods and ideas to new places.
Why did trade arise? Cities were the main reason. People wanted or needed things that they couldn’t grow or make themselves. Ancient trade networks developed to fill those needs.
Roads, Winds, and Camels: The Afro-Eurasian Network
Africa, Europe, and Asia are connected. Sometimes they are referred to as Afro-Eurasia. They make up more than half the land on Earth. They are also home to most people in the world. Today, the entire planet is connected. We have airplanes, ships, and trucks. We also have the Internet. Four thousand years ago, though, life was very different. But trade networks still existed across these three continents. Goods traveled from merchant to merchant across thousands of miles like a relay race.
Afro-Eurasia’s networks were more active than other parts of the world. But why? The world’s oldest farming societies developed in Afro-Eurasia. Its geography helped trade develop. Pack animals like horses and camels were available to carry goods on land. Sailing ships moved goods across the sea.
Some regions were known for certain goods. For example, silk originally came from China. Silk cloth was beautiful and useful. It became a valuable trade good. Traders carried it across Asia to the Mediterranean Sea, both by land and sea. These routes became known as the “Silk Road.” These traders carried other goods, too. They brought cotton and spices from India. Gold was traded from the coast of East Africa. Wine and glass were transported from Greece to China. Enslaved people were also bought and sold along this trade network.
Take a look at the picture below. This object is called the Standard of Ur. It was created around 2400 BCE in the city of Ur in what is now Iraq. But it is made from materials not found in that region. The blue rock comes from where Afghanistan is today. The figures made from white shells are from the Persian Gulf. The red stone is from India. Traders brought all these materials to Ur more than 4,400 years ago.
Trade became a big deal in Afro-Eurasia in this time period. It connected almost all societies there for the first time in history.
Sharp Black Rocks: The Mesoamerican Network
About 3,000 years ago, trade networks also developed in the western half of the world. The biggest of these networks was in Mesoamerica. Today, we know this region as Mexico and Central America.
Long-distance trade in the Americas required great effort. The mountains in this region were high. The rivers were not good for transportation. People there did not have pack animals, like horses. They had to carry most goods on their own backs. But large trade networks existed.
Like in Afro-Eurasia, traders mainly moved between big cities. Such cities often developed near valuable resources. Obsidian was one such resource. People in Mesoamerica used this black volcanic rock to make tools and weapons. Teotihuacan was near two big obsidian mines. This resource made the city wealthy and powerful.
Traders in the region carried obsidian to where it wasn’t as common. They also traded luxury goods. Mayan merchants moved up and down the Yucatan Peninsula. They traded cacao, jade, and salt. Zapotec merchants traded on the Pacific Coast. They were known for their cloth and pottery.
Traders also transported ideas. Sometimes they introduced new cultural practices to new places.
The impact of networks on communities
Rulers encouraged trade. It brought wealth and resources to their kingdoms. They built roads to make trade easier. Their armies protected merchants from bandits. As a result, trade networks rapidly grew in this time period. They connected distant societies like never before.
Sources
Beaujard, Philippe. “From Three Possible Iron-Age World-Systems to a Single Afro-Eurasian World-System.” Journal of World History 21, no. 1 (2010): 1-43.
Benjamin, Craig, ed. The Cambridge World History. Vol. 4. The Cambridge World History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
Chase-Dunn, Christopher and Thomas D. Hall. Rise and Demise: Comparing World-Systems. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1997.
Christian, David. “Silk Roads or Steppe Roads? The Silk Roads in World History.” Journal of World History 11, no. 1 (2000): 1-26.
Pool, Christopher. Olmec Archaeology and Early Mesoamerica. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Schoff, Wilfred H. The Periplus of the Erythraean Sea: Travel and Trade in the Indian Ocean by a Merchant of the First Century (New York: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1912). Digitized by Lance Jenott, 2004. https://depts.washington.edu/silkroad/texts/periplus/periplus.html
Nicole Magie
Nicole Magie is an Assistant Professor at Olivet College in Michigan. She is also a long-time member of the World History Association and the Midwest World History Association, and an associate editor for World History Connected.
Image credits
This work is licensed under CC BY 4.0 except for the following:
Cover: Erythraei Sive Rubri Maris Periplus, From: “Theatrum orbis terrarum” by Abraham Ortelius (Antwerp, 1603), 1603. © Photo by Abraham Ortelius / Royal Geographical Society / Getty Images
Bactrian camels have two humps, and can carry heavy loads for long distances in most climates. By Becker1999, CC BY 2.0. https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=64236677
Afro-Eurasian trade routes, first century CE (c. 150 CE). By WHP, CC BY-NC 4.0.
Standard of Ur, peace panel, c. 2500 BCE. By Geni, CC BY-SA 4.0. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Standard_of_ur_peace_2013.JPG
In Teotihuacan, impressive buildings like the Pyramid of the Sun on the far left and those surrounding it, demonstrate the complexity of these societies that were located along these Mesoamerican trade networks. By Rene Trohs - Own work, CC BY- SA 4.0. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teotihuacan#/media/File:Panoramic_view_of_Teotihuacan.jpg
Obsidian sample collected near Monte Pilato, Lipari Island (Aeolian Islands, Sicily). By Ji-ElleIt, CC BY-SA 3.0. https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=15527635
Obsidian arrowhead, public domain. https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=589231
Jadestien, by Immanuel Giel, CC BY-SA 3.0. https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=139195
Jade sculpture, by David Mateos García, CC BY 2.0. https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=84653
Alexander the Great’s empire and route. By Generic Mapping Tools, CC BY-SA 3.0. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/ File:MacedonEmpire.jpg
Articles leveled by Newsela have been adjusted along several dimensions of text complexity including sentence structure, vocabulary and organization. The number followed by L indicates the Lexile measure of the article. For more information on Lexile measures and how they correspond to grade levels: www.lexile.com/educators/understanding-lexile-measures/
To learn more about Newsela, visit www.newsela.com/about.
The Lexile® Framework for Reading evaluates reading ability and text complexity on the same developmental scale. Unlike other measurement systems, the Lexile Framework determines reading ability based on actual assessments, rather than generalized age or grade levels. Recognized as the standard for matching readers with texts, tens of millions of students worldwide receive a Lexile measure that helps them find targeted readings from the more than 100 million articles, books and websites that have been measured. Lexile measures connect learners of all ages with resources at the right level of challenge and monitors their progress toward state and national proficiency standards. More information about the Lexile® Framework can be found at www.Lexile.com.