Non-State Terrorism
Misconceptions about terror
When you read the word, “terrorism,” what’s the first thing that comes to mind?
If your first thoughts were about militant Islamism, you’re not alone. Many people associate the word terrorism with violent actions of radical Islamists. Attacks by Islamist groups like Al-Qaeda, the Islamic State (ISIS), and Boko Haram have gotten a lot of media attention in recent years. However, there’s nothing uniquely Islamic about terrorism and nothing terrorist about Islam. Terrorism is a part of our world. It is better for us to figure out why it exists in broad terms than to focus on one type of terrorism.
The United Nations is a global organization that tries to promote world peace and equality. It defines terrorism as “criminal acts intended to provoke a state of terror in the general public, a group of persons or particular persons for political purposes.”1 Terrorism uses violence to create fear. Terrorism is designed to scare a government or the public. People who use terrorism hope that others will change their behavior.2
The people who employ the tools of terror think of themselves as freedom fighters, not terrorists. They believe they are fighting oppression and want to push their own belief system onto society.
A long history of terror
Terrorism has been around since ancient and medieval periods. In the Roman Empire, a group of Jewish rebels called Sicarri murdered civilians who opposed their revolt against Roman rule. The Hashashins were a Muslim sect in medieval Persia who assassinated political leaders. In 1605, Guy Fawkes, an English Catholic, plotted to blow up the English Parliament. He and his co-conspirators hoped to inspire a Catholic rebellion, but their plot failed. The motivation, tactics, and goals of these early groups shared a lot in common with terrorism today. A non-state group wanted to defeat a state. They attacked civilians and officials to create an atmosphere of fear.
The Industrial Revolution provided new tools for terrorists. Anarchists in the United States and Europe used dynamite for political assassinations. In the 1800s, terrorists targeted political leaders, rather than civilians. For example, a group of Russian revolutionaries used dynamite to assassinate the Russian Tzar in 1881.
Terrorism in the twentieth century
Three social transformations changed terrorism in the twentieth century: democracy, urbanization, and nationalism. More people lived under democratic regimes—which made killing a king much less effective. Terrorists turned their attention toward masses of civilians. And with cities getting more crowded, explosives were more effective.
Nationalism is the belief that national identity comes first. Nationalists used terror against the empires that ruled them. In the Austrian, Ottoman, and British Empires, nationalists used violence to secure national independence. The Irish Republican Army (IRA) was formed during World War I. The IRA was in favor of Irish independence from Britain. Unable to directly challenge the British Empire, they used terrorist tactics. After Ireland won independence, the IRA focused on Northern Ireland, which remained part of the United Kingdom. The IRA attacked Protestant civilians and British leaders until the 1990s.
Other groups used terrorism against their own government. A revolutionary communist group in Peru called the Shining Path attacked Peruvian officials and civilians. They wanted to topple the government and replace it with communism. In the 1980s and 1990s, Shining Path members assassinated leaders, destroyed infrastructure, and bombed public spaces.
Far-right groups have also used terrorism. In the United States, the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) was founded after the Civil War. During the 1950s and 1960s, the KKK reemerged and launched a campaign of terror to intimidate Black Americans and uphold racial segregation.
Today, we often associate terrorism with religion, but most twentieth-century terrorism was secular, or non- religious. At the 1972 Olympics, a group of Palestinian terrorists murdered eleven members of the Israeli national team. Palestine and Israel have a long and complicated relationship concerning territory in the Middle East and nationalism from both sides. As terrorist organizations grew in the Middle East, tactics such as embassy bombing and plane hijacking became more common. These groups focused on political goals. However, the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979 set the stage for a new sort of terrorism: militant jihadism. The Soviet war in Afghanistan lasted ten years. It provided training and experience to many of the fighters who would later join groups like Al- Qaeda. These Mujahideen3 soon left Afghanistan to fight in conflicts in other parts of the world.
Militant jihadist organizations have become the face of terrorism since 2001. Al-Qaeda’s attacks on 9/11 and the American response helped expand several other militant jihadist organizations. The Islamic State (ISIS) recently rose to prominence. In Nigeria, Boko Haram has committed violence to undermine the government.
Recently, white supremacists have committed terrorist attacks around the world. White supremacy is the wrong and racist belief that white people are superior to other races. In Christchurch, New Zealand, a white supremacist targeted two mosques in an anti-Muslim attack.
When terror wins
Terrorists want to provoke an overreaction. They want to seem like a huge threat to create panic and chaos. Governments have used the fear of terrorism to justify wars and surveillance of citizens. After the 9/11 attacks, a global war on terror mobilized national governments to brutally repress terrorist groups. The Tamil Tigers had operated in Sri Lanka since the 1970s. But in 2009, the government crushed the revolutionary group, using violence and mass imprisonment. The war on terror was so horrifying it changed the strategies of many older, non-Islamist terrorist organizations. Some groups, like the Basque separatist party in Spain, declared a truce in 2006 and ceased violent attacks, partly in fear of becoming a target.
Are we too afraid of terrorists? Deaths from terrorist attacks have increased in recent decades, but the number is still relatively small. 2014 was the deadliest year for terrorist attacks. 32,685 people were killed globally. The media focuses most of its attention on terrorist attacks in wealthy, Western nations, but these are only a small percentage of the global total. In 2017, terrorism accounted for 0.05 percent of global deaths, or 1 in 2,000. Of these, only 0.9 percent were in the world’s wealthiest nations. That’s about 1 in 222,000.
When there is a terrorist attack, it’s all over the news. Governments respond forcefully, and there is an outpouring of emotion and fear. But this fear makes the danger seem larger than it really is. This type of response creates chaos. This is the exact reaction that terrorist attacks are designed to provoke.
1 There’s no single, accepted definition of terrorism. Different governments and organizations each have different definitions. Most definitions look a lot like this one.
2 One can argue that states have used the tools of terrorism to oppress their own citizens. However, state terrorism is something pretty different and not the focus of this particular article.
3 Mujahideen is Arabic for “those involved in jihad.” Some militant Islamist groups use the word jihad to mean a struggle against the enemies of Islam. But in the Quran, jihad has a different meaning.
Sources
Chaliand, Gérard and Arnaud Blin, eds. The History of Terrorism: From Antiquity to ISIS. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2016).
Law, Randall David, ed. The Routledge History of Terrorism. (New York: Routledge, 2015).
Lynn, John A. Another Kind of War: The Nature and History of Terrorism. (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2019).
Rönnlund, Anna Rosling and Ola Rosling. “Detailed Notes for the Book Factfulness.” October 4, 2018. https://drive.google.com/file/d/10iS-hLWQ-okRPJiwfUKEAZh4ceYKmoKa/view
Rosling, Hans, Ola Rosling, and Anna Rosling Rönnlund. Factfulness: Ten Reasons We’re Wrong about the World—and Why Things are Better than You Think. (New York: Flatiron Books, 2018).
Bennett Sherry
Bennett Sherry holds a PhD in history from the University of Pittsburgh and has undergraduate teaching experience in world history, human rights, and the Middle East at the University of Pittsburgh and the University of Maine at Augusta. Additionally, he is a research associate at Pitt’s World History Center. Bennett writes about refugees and international organizations in the twentieth century.
Image credits
This work is licensed under CC BY 4.0 except for the following:
Cover image: Assassination attempt on Napoleon III by Felice Orsini in Paris on January 14, 1858. Painted in 1862 by H. Vittori. Oil on canvas, Paris Carnavalet Museum. © Christophel Fine Art / Universal Images Group via Getty Images.
An illustration of the assassination of Tzar Alexander II in March 1881. © ullstein bild / ullstein bild via Getty Images.
The aftermath of an IRA bombing at the Grand Hotel in Brighton, England in 1984. The bomb was intended to assassinate Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, but she escaped. Five others were killed and dozens injured. © Terry Fincher / The Fincher Files / Popperfoto via Getty Images.
KKK members stand next to a burning cross in 1958. The KKK burned crosses in public view as one method of intimidation against African Americans. Courtesy of State Archives of North Carolina. https://www.flickr.com/photos/north-carolina-state-archives/albums/72157632111647635
Members of Pittsburgh and the Squirrel Hill community pay their respects at the memorial to the 11 victims of the Tree of Life Synagogue massacre. © Matthew Hatcher / SOPA Images / LightRocket via Getty Images.
Articles leveled by Newsela have been adjusted along several dimensions of text complexity including sentence structure, vocabulary and organization. The number followed by L indicates the Lexile measure of the article. For more information on Lexile measures and how they correspond to grade levels: www.lexile.com/educators/understanding-lexile-measures/
To learn more about Newsela, visit www.newsela.com/about.
The Lexile® Framework for Reading evaluates reading ability and text complexity on the same developmental scale. Unlike other measurement systems, the Lexile Framework determines reading ability based on actual assessments, rather than generalized age or grade levels. Recognized as the standard for matching readers with texts, tens of millions of students worldwide receive a Lexile measure that helps them find targeted readings from the more than 100 million articles, books and websites that have been measured. Lexile measures connect learners of all ages with resources at the right level of challenge and monitors their progress toward state and national proficiency standards. More information about the Lexile® Framework can be found at www.Lexile.com.