Rise of China
Introduction
Napoleon Bonaparte is believed to have said, “Let China sleep; when she wakes she will shake the world.” Economists who have tracked China’s fast economic growth often quote Napoleon’s prediction. Regardless of whether Napoleon really said this or what he meant, China is certainly awake these days. And it is radically changing the world economy. Since 1980, China’s economy has grown faster than any other in the world.
Was China ever sleeping? What woke it up? It’s difficult to say. Historians and economists have many different answers to these questions. Compared to Europe and the United States, which were developing quickly in the 1800s, China’s economy did seem to be pretty sleepy for a few hundred years. The reasons for this are complicated, though, and we won’t really address them here. What we will talk about are China’s economic changes in the second half of the 1900s.
China experienced some growth during the time of the Communist leader Mao Zedong, who ruled from 1949 to 1976. China’s economy really grew in the decades after Mao’s death, though. Why? There are many different reasons, but there are a couple of common ones. First, the state of China became decentralized, meaning the power shifted away from a strong, central government. Second, the economy became increasingly privatized. Others point to various cultural reasons. Looking at the history of China’s economy since WWII might help us make sense of these changes.
China after World War II
In the mid-1900s, the Communist Party of China won a violent civil war. There began a new communist era under leader Mao Zedong. The country’s leaders set about modernizing and industrializing China. This modernity had to have a communist flavor, as opposed to capitalist values, though.
This transition took the shape of repurposing rural land, collectivizing agriculture, and spending money on businesses in cities. Land and resources were totally redistributed, or given to different people to create more equality. By the mid-1900s, some of these efforts had improved the quality of life for the average Chinese person. Poverty went down and literacy went up. Educational opportunities increased. Mao was not satisfied with the speed or equality of progress, though. Still, growth was uneven as cities gained wealth and rural China could not keep up.
In the late 1950s, Mao introduced a program called The Great Leap Forward. A major goal was industrializing the countryside. This called for small-scale industry in the countryside and more education.
The Great Leap Forward had some successes. Railroads, bridges, canals, power stations, and irrigation systems were improved. Ultimately though, the plan was a failure. In the rush to industrialize, communist leaders put forward projects that sometimes had greater costs than benefits. Combined with bad weather, these problems resulted in a very serious famine. In the early 1960s, about twenty million people died of hunger.
In the mid-1960s, Mao introduced yet another program. It was called the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution. Mao believed that the slow economy was partly because of capitalist values in the Communist Party. The solution, for Mao, was to change the very culture of the country. In the late 1960s, the militant group known as the Red Guards was ordered to destroy the “Four Olds” of pre-communist China: Old Customs, Old Culture, Old Habits, and Old Ideas. As a result, much of China’s historical heritage was lost.
This hurt religious communities and ethnic minorities. Buddhist, Christian, and Muslim communities often came under attack. They were seen as either old or foreign. Places of worship and cemeteries for foreign people were destroyed. Ethnic minorities, including Mongolians, Uyghurs, Koreans, and Tibetans were abused or killed.
Changing directions
The Cultural Revolution asserted Mao’s extreme vision of communism. It strongly turned away from capitalist values. In the decades after Mao’s death, China moved in the opposite direction. Under the leader Deng Xiaoping during the 1980s, China underwent large economic changes.
Like Mao, Deng Xiaoping wanted to increase production and modernize the country. He did not dismiss the West, though. Deng Xiaoping’s approach was a lot more open to foreign influences. This meant that capitalist approaches also increasingly influenced the Chinese economy. Many Mao-era programs were undone. Some limits on religion were relaxed, and places of worship reopened.
Deng Xiaoping’s goal was to improve quality of life by the year 2000. Though he retired in 1989, his plan was ultimately a success. After the Maoist era, China was politically stable, and the economy took off. Poverty went down. The average Chinese person was healthier, with better overall nutrition, and a higher life expectancy. City centers were energized, with exports booming.
China and the global economy
Many of the goods we use today are labeled “Made in China.” This wasn’t always the case. Before the economic changes from the mid-1970s, China exported far fewer products around the world. As these changes took effect, China played a new role in the global economy. By the early 2000s, China had become the largest supplier of clothing, shoes, computer parts, and seafood. By 2010, China was the world’s second largest economy.
Because of this, China increasingly had better relations with Western countries. It also established important connections with other regions, most notably Africa. Chinese corporations play a huge role in Africa. They spend lots of money there on infrastructure, energy, and banking. The goal has been to support African building projects through low-interest loans. This is part of China’s Road and Belt Initiative to increase trade. Some say these projects have helped both China and Africa. Others say it is a new form of imperialism. If a project fails, the African nation is stuck paying the money back to China.
China has also joined global networks. Since the 1990s, China has joined the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and the World Trade Organization. China has begun to replace Japan as the leading global producer of goods.
All these changes might seem positive, but they bring new challenges as well. China experiences major problems like overcrowded cities, crime, and damage to the environment. As a result of privatization, social and economic inequality have also increased. Most of the country’s wealth belongs to a small group of people. Politicians and wealthy families continue to break many rules. Making the state and the military smaller meant that many lost their jobs. This contributed to massive migration, as over a hundred million Chinese left their homes in search of work.
So how do we understand these economic changes? It’s clear that opening up the economy played a huge role, for better or worse. Some might see this as China “waking up.” But it’s more true to describe this as a different path toward industrialization. Many experts present this as the East and West going separate ways. After an earlier “rise of the West,” was China’s fast growth part of the “rise of the East”? In the past few decades, East Asia’s share of world production has increased, while American and European shares have decreased. We can make guesses about what this means, but the truth is that there aren’t quick and easy answers. What’s clear is that China is now more than ever an important part of the global economy. Going forward, it will likely continue to have massive economic force.
Sources
Allen, Robert C. Global Economic History: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.
“China’s Fitful Sleep.” The Economist, July 17, 1997. Accessed February 27, 2019. https://www.economist.com/asia/1997/07/17/chinas-fitful-sleep
Brandt, Loren and Thomas G. Rawski. China’s Great Economic Transformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
Ebrey, Patricia Buckley and Anne Walthall. Modern East Asia: From 1600: A Cultural, Social, and Political History. Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2014.
Fish, Isaac Stone. “Crouching Tiger, Sleeping Giant.” Foreign Policy (blog). Accessed February 27, 2019. https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/01/19/china_shakes_the_world_cliche/
FitzGerald, C. P. “Religion and China’s Cultural Revolution.” Pacific Affairs 40, no. 1/2 (Spring-Summer 1967): 124–29.
Pomeranz, Kenneth. The Great Divergence: Europe, China, and the Making of the Modern World Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000.
Pomeranz, Kenneth, James B. Given, and Laura J. Mitchell. Worlds Together, Worlds Apart: A Companion Reader. New York: W. W. Norton & Co, 2011.
Ropp, Paul Stanley. China in World History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Spence, Jonathan D. The Search for Modern China. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2013.
Strayer, Robert W. Ways of the World: A Brief Global History with Sources; Volume 2: Since the Fifteenth Century. Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2019.
Xiaoping, Deng. “Building a Socialism with a Specifically Chinese Character.” Excerpt from a talk with the Japanese delegation to the second session of the Council of Sino-Japanese Non-Governmental Persons, June 30, 1984. Accessed February 27, 2019. http://academics.wellesley.edu/Polisci/wj/China/Deng/Building.htm
Eman M. Elshaikh
The author of this article is Eman M. Elshaikh. She is a writer, researcher, and teacher who has taught K-12 and undergraduates in the United States and in the Middle East and written for many different audiences. She teaches writing at the University of Chicago, where she also completed her master’s in social sciences, focusing on history and anthropology. She was previously a World History Fellow at Khan Academy, where she worked closely with the College Board to develop curriculum for AP World History.
Image credits
This work is licensed under CC BY 4.0 except for the following:
Cover: An investor walks past a screen showing stock market movements at a securities firm in Hangzhou, in eastern China’s Zhejiang province on January 11, 2016. © STR/AFP via Getty Images.
China and other major developing economies by GDP per capita at purchasing-power parity, 1990–2013. The rapid economic growth of China (blue) is readily apparent. CircleAdrian from World Bank World Development Indicators 2014 data, CC BY-SA 3.0. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Graph_of_Major_Developing_Economies_by_Real_GDP_per_capita_at_PPP_1990-2013.png
Commune members eating collectively in a commune cafeteria in 1958. These cafeterias provided free meals until agricultural production slowed. Public domain. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Leap_Forward#/media/File:People%27s_commone_canteen3.jpg
Backyard furnace used to produce steel during the Great Leap Forward, 1958. Workers often labored through the night to make steel. Public domain. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Backyard_furnace4.jpg
Cultural Revolution propaganda poster. Cultural Revolution propaganda poster. The Red Guards protest by brandishing an anti Maoist book by Hai Jui, c.1967, China. © Photo12/Universal Images Group via Getty Images.
Faces of Buddha statues that were destroyed during the Cultural Revolution. Pat B, CC BY-SA 2.0. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_Revolution#/media/File:Trip_to_Ningxia_and_Gansu.jpg
The Lujiazui financial district of Pudong, Shanghai, the financial and commercial hub of modern China. Simon Desmarais, CC BY-SA 2.0. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_economic_reform#/media/File:Shanghai_Skyline,_Dec2014.jpg
Deng Xiaoping (center) with U.S. president Gerald Ford (left), First Lady Betty Ford (right), and Deng’s interpreter (back), 1975. Public domain. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deng_Xiaoping#/media/File:Gerald_and_Betty_Ford_meet_with_Deng_Xiaoping,_1975_A7598-20A.jpg
Articles leveled by Newsela have been adjusted along several dimensions of text complexity including sentence structure, vocabulary and organization. The number followed by L indicates the Lexile measure of the article. For more information on Lexile measures and how they correspond to grade levels: www.lexile.com/educators/understanding-lexile-measures/
To learn more about Newsela, visit www.newsela.com/about.
The Lexile® Framework for Reading evaluates reading ability and text complexity on the same developmental scale. Unlike other measurement systems, the Lexile Framework determines reading ability based on actual assessments, rather than generalized age or grade levels. Recognized as the standard for matching readers with texts, tens of millions of students worldwide receive a Lexile measure that helps them find targeted readings from the more than 100 million articles, books and websites that have been measured. Lexile measures connect learners of all ages with resources at the right level of challenge and monitors their progress toward state and national proficiency standards. More information about the Lexile® Framework can be found at www.Lexile.com.