The Solutions We Have and the Innovations We Need
Introduction
The solutions to climate change are already all around us. You’re probably seeing more electric vehicles in your community. Maybe you’ve noticed solar panels on houses or wind turbines in the countryside. Or it could be that your local grocery store is stocking more plant- based meat substitutes.
These everyday solutions are evidence of the real progress we’re already making. They can be divided into two basic types: solutions that increase mitigation, and others that increase adaptation. Mitigation solutions reduce emissions of the carbon- based greenhouse gases that cause global warming. Adaptation solutions lessen the impacts of a changing climate. In both these areas, we have come a long way.
How much progress have we made? This is a question the International Energy Agency (IEA) asks in a 2023 report about what it would take to limit global warming to 1.5° Celsius. In its report, the IEA said we have the technologies to account for about 65% of the emissions reductions necessary to limit warming to that 1.5° C.1
This is a major achievement. In 2021, the IEA released a similar report that said we had about 50% of the technology we would need to limit warming to 1.5° C. Going from 50% to 65% in just two years is an impressive jump.
Still, while getting 65% of the way is certainly something to celebrate, it’s not enough. To reach our goal, we’re going to need to develop new technologies and practices.
Let’s take a look at both the solutions we have and the innovations we need to reach our climate goals.
The solutions we have
When it comes to reducing carbon emissions, perhaps the biggest achievement is the progress we’ve made toward generating renewable energy. Renewable energy is energy that comes from a source that cannot be used up, such as wind or the sun. The cost of renewable energy technologies like wind power and solar power has dropped dramatically in recent years. As the chart shows, the price of electricity from solar declined by 89% between 2009 and 2019. The price of electricity from wind declined by 70% over the same period. These drops in price were primarily driven by decreases in the cost of technology. As we began using more solar and wind systems, companies learned how to produce these systems more efficiently, and prices dropped. Lower prices fueled further expansion, creating a positive feedback loop of increasing adoption and decreasing prices. As a result, by 2019, 72% of all new electricity production capacity came from renewables. Solar is now the cheapest source of energy on the planet.
While some innovators have worked on the clean energy problem, others have found ways to adapt to a changing climate. Some of the best adaptation solutions are the simplest ones. Local authorities restore natural ecosystems, like wetlands and mangroves, to act as natural barriers against floods. These areas also act as carbon sinks that pull carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere. Other solutions can be used to protect cities. For example, buildings, roads, and bridges can be designed to be more resistant to extreme weather. Smart city planning can make a difference too. In a world in which climate change can cause health problems, vaccines and high-quality healthcare are also increasingly important adaptation solutions.
The innovations we need
The fact that we already have so many solutions is wonderful, but on their own, these solutions aren’t enough to solve all our problems. We’re still going to need more innovation.
Climate innovation is the label we give to the research, development, and scaling of new climate solutions. Innovation is not just inventing new devices — it’s also about new approaches to policies, business models, and systems. Innovation means both new technologies and new ways of doing and thinking about things.
What should the goals of innovation be? To start, we need to protect those who are most vulnerable to the impacts of a changing climate. In general, these are people who had very little role in creating the problems of climate change in the first place. We need to develop a wide range of health and agricultural innovations so that those living in areas impacted by extreme drought, flooding, and severe weather have access to nutritious food and fresh water. Because climate change will alter rainfall levels and temperature in many areas, we’ll need to develop high-yield, drought- and flood-resistant crops. These plants must be well-suited to the specific regions in which they’re grown.
We also need to develop new technologies to reduce the amount of carbon being released into the atmosphere. The process of replacing carbon-based energy with other sources of energy is known as decarbonization. Electric cars are one solution, but they are not enough. Hydrogen fuel and advanced biofuels are needed to decarbonize industries that can’t yet run on electricity, such as long-distance trucking and aviation. Other industries, such as steel and cement production, release carbon dioxide as a by-product of the chemical reactions that are part of their processes. So, we’ll need to develop entirely new ways of making these products.
What’s next?
To speed up the pace of innovation, we need governments and companies to invest heavily in the research and development of new technologies. And to create markets for emerging innovations, we need governments, companies, and individuals who can afford it to commit to purchasing them—even if they are more expensive at first. This will drive demand, and ultimately lower prices for everyone.
But not all countries have the resources to invest in innovation. We’ll need grants and loans to support low- income countries as they work to adapt to climate change and decarbonize their economies. Wealthy countries, in particular, have a responsibility to support adaptation efforts and disaster-relief funds in low-income countries. Countries like the US that have benefited the most from industrialization and that historically did the most to cause climate change, can ensure poorer countries are able to continue developing in a sustainable way.
To ensure the health and well-being of everyone, we need to equally value adaptation and mitigation efforts, and we need to make wise decisions. Our actions now will impact everyone’s future.
1 IEA (2021), Net Zero by 2050, IEA, Paris. https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-by-2050
Molly Sinnott
Molly Sinnott is a member of the Climate Project editorial team. She was previously a classroom reading and writing teacher, specializing in supporting students in executive-function skills development. She focuses on building approachable and inclusive content for a diverse range of students.
Credit: “The Solutions We Have and the Innovation We Need”, Molly Sinnott / OER Project, https://www.oerproject.com/
Image credits
This work is licensed under CC BY 4.0 except for the following:
Cover image: Solar farm and wind turbines near the highway road interchange. © Adam Smigielski / E+ / Getty Images.
Electric vehicles and charging stations are an increasingly common sight in communities. © seksan Mongkhonkhamsao / Moment / Getty Images.
As this chart demonstrates, the price of solar and wind energy has seen huge reductions in cost in the last decade. The cost of fossil fuels, on the other hand, has remained constant. By Our World in Data, CC BY. https://ourworldindata.org/cheap-renewables-growth
Global installations of selected clean energy technologies, 2010-2022. These charts show the positive trends in adoption of four climate mitigation solutions. By IEA, CC BY 4.0. https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/7c02e774-9d1b-4398-9313-840913e1b4e6/NetZeroRoadmap_AGlobalPathwaytoKeepthe1.5CGoalinReach-2023Update.pdf
At a plant in Germany, hydrogen fuel cells are being built for use in vehicles. Hydrogen fuel cells are lighter, more compact, and have greater range than lithium-ion batteries, making them promising solutions for transportation needs like long-distance trucking. © Marijan Murat / picture alliance via Getty Images.
Articles leveled by Newsela have been adjusted along several dimensions of text complexity including sentence structure, vocabulary and organization. The number followed by L indicates the Lexile measure of the article. For more information on Lexile measures and how they correspond to grade levels: www.lexile.com/educators/understanding-lexile-measures/
To learn more about Newsela, visit www.newsela.com/about.
The Lexile® Framework for Reading evaluates reading ability and text complexity on the same developmental scale. Unlike other measurement systems, the Lexile Framework determines reading ability based on actual assessments, rather than generalized age or grade levels. Recognized as the standard for matching readers with texts, tens of millions of students worldwide receive a Lexile measure that helps them find targeted readings from the more than 100 million articles, books and websites that have been measured. Lexile measures connect learners of all ages with resources at the right level of challenge and monitors their progress toward state and national proficiency standards. More information about the Lexile® Framework can be found at www.Lexile.com.