Unit 3 Introduction: Cities, Societies, and Empires
People don’t have to live in states and there’s no rule that states must have cities. People in states and cities do not need to be farmers themselves or trade with others in farming-based places. But, these four things usually happen together. This unit will explore why and how they are connected.
There are many reasons why the history we study tends to focus on agrarian cities and states. History is usually written by people in cities and states that are centers of farming and trade. Those cities and states are places where people exchange ideas and create, so they often seem like important historical centers.
However, a lot happened during the period we’re covering in Unit 3—and even after—in societies that weren’t states or cities, didn’t farm, and weren’t trade centers. We’re going to learn about some of these societies too. But, because changes in these societies were usually slower, we’re going to focus more on how trade grew, cities developed, and states formed. These changes really shaped how humans live, connect, and create.
Village networks
By 6000 BCE, humans had spread from Africa across most continents and islands. Some communities began farming and raising animals, while others continued gathering and hunting. These groups adapted to their surroundings, developing unique strategies and tools.
Innovation was often spurred by environmental changes or through exchanges with other societies. New methods, ideas, and tools typically originated in one place. Then, they spread to other societies through trade, conflicts, and intermarriage. When societies interacted, they frequently adopted or modified these innovations to fit their needs. Major inventions in human history—like iron and boba tea—originated just a few times. They then traveled through networks globally as different groups adopted and enjoyed them.
During this era, local networks were crucial for survival. Agricultural villages and nomadic tribes formed connections. Each group specialized in specific products to trade for other goods. This exploration of community types and their trade and interaction networks highlights the complexity of early human societies.
Long-distance trade
Trade networks began locally but expanded significantly over time. Across the globe, these networks facilitated the movement of goods, people, and ideas. With the emergence of cities, metropolitan networks formed, linking cities to their surrounding villages and rural areas. These cities had some level of control over these areas due to their larger populations.
As a result, trade networks grew even more extensive. In Eurasia, the domestication of horses enabled faster communication. Rulers could extend their influence to further regions from their empire’s capitals. Similarly, the introduction of camels in western Asia and Africa revolutionized travel across deserts, increasing the rate at which people and goods could move. In the Americas, llamas played a comparable role, aiding in the transportation across various terrains.
At sea, better ways to build ships and navigate expanded trade to far places. In areas like the Caribbean, the Mediterranean, and the Baltic seas—and later the Pacific Ocean—large networks of trade relied on skilled shipbuilders and sailors. On land, advances in technology also played a role. Infrastructure projects like road construction made connections more efficient. As a result, travel increased. Although the number of travelers was small compared to the total population, those who traveled learned different languages, encountered fresh ideas, and shared those concepts in new locations.
Cities
Cities and trade have a “which came first, the chicken or the egg?” situation. Cities often began around markets where traders from various places met. But, as cities grew, they boosted trade since city dwellers had surplus items like money and food. They sought luxury items to improve their lives.
The earliest cities might have emerged in Anatolia, Mesopotamia, and Egypt, around 6,000 years ago. In regions like China, India, and Southeast Asia, cities formed about 5,000 years ago. Later, from 4,000 to 2,500 years ago, new cities developed in Mesoamerica, the Andes, the Mediterranean, and sub-Saharan Africa.
Cities were established for several reasons. Some benefited from trade routes, others were built for defense, some for religious gatherings, and others as government hubs. These cities were part of farming societies, where agriculture produced a surplus of food. This surplus supported soldiers, priests, builders, and specialists needed in cities. Yet, each society or city, like Shang Dynasty China, Nubia, or Mesopotamia, had its unique structure and lifestyle.
One thing these societies all shared was a group of wealthy people. Usually, this group was small, and the majority of people in the cities were poor in comparison. The majority of people worked hard and often got sick because of the crowded conditions in cities, where people, animals, and waste were all close together.
States
Long-distance trade made a small group of people very rich. These “elite” people had special rights and power because they controlled money and resources. To keep their special rights safe, elites started to build the state. This included making rules, laws, government buildings, and armies that protected everyone, but especially the rich ones. In their chase for more power and wealth, elites could push states to start violence and wars bigger than any seen before in human societies.
The rise of the state was closely connected to the development of writing. And writing was probably the most important development during this era. The ability to read and write was rare and generally something only the wealthy had. Therefore, writing deepened the distance between elites and commoners. The first written texts weren’t love poems or novels; they were inventories and receipts for things people owned and traded. Writing started as a way to record the trading of goods and surpluses of food. Writing allowed a merchant to record that they had traded three goats for five bushels of wheat. It let rulers write down instructions to the commanders and governors overseeing the furthest edges of their states.
Still, not all states were the same, as we will see. Assyria, in Mesopotamia, had a hierarchical structure. It was quite different from the negotiated power of Jenne-Jeno, in West Africa. Instead of a ruling elite, different groups split power in Jenne-Jeno. The Olmec cities of Mesoamerica had decentralized rule by religious leaders. This was a big difference from the centralized power of Akkadian kings in Mesopotamia.
Despite all the connections that developed during this period, human societies remained quite diverse. In fact, the wide range of economies, social structures, and cultures in this period helps remind us of the shared creativity that is a human trait. There’s no single pathway for human societies. Each is a product of trade and exchange mixed with local ideas and the genius of individuals. Ancient societies unleashed that genius in ways that made for unique communities while contributing to a shared human history.
About the author
Trevor Getz The author of this article is Trevor Getz. He is Professor of African History at San Francisco State University. He has written eleven books on African and world history, including Abina and the Important Men. He is also the author of A Primer for Teaching African History, which explores questions about how we should teach the history of Africa in high school and university classes.
Image credits
This work is licensed under CC BY 4.0 except for the following:
Egyptian Eighteenth Dynasty Wall Painting of Agricultural Scenes from the Tomb of Unsou. Courtesy of The Gallery Collection/Corbis.
Iron, so key to agriculture, was the result of a very sophisticated technique that was probably only developed twice in human history—in Anatolia and West Africa—and then spread around the world through trade. Courtesy The Trustees of the British Museum, CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/H_1982-0103-308
A modern view of the central plaza in the city of Teotihuacan, which formed a nexus for trade routes in Mesoamerica. By Rene Trohs, CC BY-SA 4.0. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Panoramic_view_of_Teotihuacan.jpg
Chavín de Huántar, in modern-day Peru. This is the interior hallway of a temple in a design totally unique to the area. By Martin St-Amant, CC BY 3.0. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chav%C3%ADn_de_Huantar_Ao%C3%BBt_2007_-_Corridors_Int%C3%A9rieurs_1.jpg
The “War Panel” of the Standard of the City of Ur, c. 2600 BCE. Public domain. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_of_Ur#/media/File:Standard_of_Ur_-_War.jpg

Articles leveled by Newsela have been adjusted along several dimensions of text complexity including sentence structure, vocabulary and organization. The number followed by L indicates the Lexile measure of the article. For more information on Lexile measures and how they correspond to grade levels: www.lexile.com/educators/understanding-lexile-measures/
To learn more about Newsela, visit www.newsela.com/about.

The Lexile® Framework for Reading evaluates reading ability and text complexity on the same developmental scale. Unlike other measurement systems, the Lexile Framework determines reading ability based on actual assessments, rather than generalized age or grade levels. Recognized as the standard for matching readers with texts, tens of millions of students worldwide receive a Lexile measure that helps them find targeted readings from the more than 100 million articles, books and websites that have been measured. Lexile measures connect learners of all ages with resources at the right level of challenge and monitors their progress toward state and national proficiency standards. More information about the Lexile® Framework can be found at www.Lexile.com.