Village Networks

By Eman M. Elshaikh
For much of human history, we lived in small villages and towns, not in the large cities and societies we’re used to today. What was life like in these villages?

Cookie Policy

Our website uses cookies to understand content and feature usage to drive site improvements over time. To learn more, review our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Birds-eye view drawing shows a network of structures and homes.

Introduction

Long ago, humans were hunter-gatherers. They looked for their food in nature. Early humans collected plants and hunted for fresh meat. The beginning of farming was one of the biggest changes in human history.

Painting shows a couple using what appears to be a tilling machine pulled by an ox, below them are several plants

Sennedjem and his wife in the fields sowing and tilling, from the Tomb of Sennedjem, The Workers’ Village, New Kingdom (wall painting).

Farming allowed humans to store extra food. That left more time for other activities. In this way, farming made it possible for humans to build complex societies.

These societies did not appear overnight. They developed over a long period of time. Most early communities lived in villages and small towns.

These early villages grew in different ways. Some eventually became large cities. Others remained independent villages. We do not have written records from most villages. However, scientific studies have revealed a lot of information. Scientists have been able to reconstruct a story about early village life.

Social life before the city

What was life like before farming? Early hunter-gatherer societies were largely egalitarian. That means all people were treated equally. No one had more power than anyone else. This continued to be the case in early farming villages. People in these communities were equal. Most people living in villages spent their time producing food. Work was mostly divided by gender. Women spent more time taking care of children. However, they also helped to produce food. These gender divisions did not necessarily mean women were not treated equally.

How do scientists know this? Digs at ancient sites in Ukraine and the town of Çatalhüyük in Turkey show that houses were mostly about the same size. Evidence shows that people in villages probably shared tools and workspaces. Objects in homes were of mostly equal value, too.

Sculpture shows a female body in a seat with two animals by her side

Seated Mother Goddess of Çatalhüyük c. 5500 BCE. By Nevit Dilmen, CC BY-SA 3.0.

Farming communities were different than foraging communities. People lived closer together, which meant disease could spread quickly. Farmers also worried more about weather since their food supply depended on it. The importance of weather is evident in early religious beliefs and practices.

These societies were not models of equality. As villages grew, people developed new ideas. One of these was the idea of owning things. Before farming, everyone shared. Owning things made people less equal since some people had more than others. Farming also impacted gender roles. Over time, women focused less on producing food and more on caring for their children and homes.

Before long-distance trade

Early villages traded with each other in networks. This allowed them to acquire things like obsidian. Obsidian is a black glass that comes from cooled volcanic lava. It is used to make sharp cutting tools. Parts of obsidian tools have been found in Turkey and the Pacific Ocean islands.

Photo of small, shiny, black rocks

Obsidian mirrors excavated by James Mellaart and his team in Çatalhüyük. By Omar hoftun, CC BY-SA 3.0.

Map shows small area where Lapita pottery has been found between three larger regions

Region where Lapita pottery has been found. By Christophe cagé, CC BY-SA 3.0.

Historians use artifacts to learn about early trade networks. For example, obsidian, ceramics, shells, and plants reveal that islands in Oceania traded with each other. In the Americas, coastal villages traded fish, mollusks, and shells with inland villages. The inland villages grew corn and potatoes and raised llamas. Trade caused early villages to expand. People built roads and bridges to reach new areas. Trade also increased how people took on special tasks. That means people had different kinds of jobs. For example, some people focused on growing food. Others made tools or built buildings. Larger projects needed to be managed by leaders. As a result, some people became more powerful than others. Society became more unequal.

Gender roles continued to change. For example, men often took control of the family’s money. This left women with less power. However, this did not happen everywhere in quite the same way. People had different ideas of gender and family in different parts of the world.

Trade helped villages to grow. Because of this, village networks also increased trade. Over time, villages in main areas became larger. Many turned into cities. This produced a new kind of life that was very different from village life.

Sources

Bickler, Simon H. “Early Pottery Exchange along the South Coast of Papua New Guinea.” Archaeology in Oceania 32, no. 2 (1997): 151–62.

Brown, Cynthia Stokes. Big History: From the Big Bang to the Present. New York: New Press: Distributed by W.W. Norton, 2007.

Bulliet, Richard W. The Earth and Its Peoples: A Global History. Boston, MA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning, 2011.

Christian, David. Maps of Time: An Introduction to Big History. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2011.

Golitko, Mark, Matthew Schauer, and John Edward Terrell. “Identification of Fergusson Island Obsidian on the Sepik Coast of Northern Papua New Guinea.” Archaeology in Oceania 47, no. 3 (2012): 151–56.

Kirch, Patrick V. “Prehistoric Exchange in Western Melanesia.” Annual Review of Anthropology 20 (1991): 141–65.

Lape, Peter V. “A Highway and a Crossroads: Island Southeast Asia and Culture Contact Archaeology.” Archaeology in Oceania 38, no. 2 (2003): 102–9.

Quintus, Seth J. “Terrestrial Food Production and Land Use in Prehistoric Samoa: An Example from Olosega Island, Manu’a, American Samoa.” Archaeology in Oceania 47, no. 3 (2012): 133–40.

Specht, Jim, Richard Fullagar, Robin Torrence, and Neville Baker. “Prehistoric Obsidian Exchange on Melanesia: A Perspective from the Talasea Sources.” Australian Archaeology, no. 27 (1988): 3–16.

Eman M. Elshaikh

The author of this article is Eman M. Elshaikh. She is a writer, researcher, and teacher who has taught K-12 and undergraduates in the United States and in the Middle East. She teaches writing at the University of Chicago, where she also completed her master’s in social sciences and is currently pursuing her PhD. She was previously a World History Fellow at Khan Academy, where she worked closely with the College Board to develop curriculum for AP World History.

Image credits

Creative Commons This work is licensed under CC BY 4.0 except for the following:

Cover: The city of Çatalhüyük, with its one-room houses which were accessed from the roof, drawing, Turkey, VII-VI millennium BC. © De Agostini Picture Library/Getty Images

Sennedjem and his wife in the fields sowing and tilling, from the Tomb of Sennedjem, The Workers’ Village, New Kingdom (wall painting), Deir el-Medina, Thebes, Egypt. © Getty Images.

A restoration of a typical living quarter in Catal Hüyük, by Elelicht - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=22743701.

Seated Mother Goddess of Çatalhüyük c. 5500 BCE, by Nevit Dilmen (talk) - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=14783156.

Obsidian mirrors excavated by James Mellaart and his team in Çatalhüyük, by Omar hoftun - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=26650321.

Region where Lapita pottery has been found, By Christophe Cagé - travail personnel (own work). Based on Matthew Spriggs, Chapter 6. The Lapita Culture and Austronesian Prehistory in Oceania - Part 1. Origins and Dispersals - Map 1: Lapita sites and find spots in the southwest Pacific, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=5543968


Newsela

Articles leveled by Newsela have been adjusted along several dimensions of text complexity including sentence structure, vocabulary and organization. The number followed by L indicates the Lexile measure of the article. For more information on Lexile measures and how they correspond to grade levels: www.lexile.com/educators/understanding-lexile-measures/

To learn more about Newsela, visit www.newsela.com/about.

The Lexile Framework for Reading

The Lexile® Framework for Reading evaluates reading ability and text complexity on the same developmental scale. Unlike other measurement systems, the Lexile Framework determines reading ability based on actual assessments, rather than generalized age or grade levels. Recognized as the standard for matching readers with texts, tens of millions of students worldwide receive a Lexile measure that helps them find targeted readings from the more than 100 million articles, books and websites that have been measured. Lexile measures connect learners of all ages with resources at the right level of challenge and monitors their progress toward state and national proficiency standards. More information about the Lexile® Framework can be found at www.Lexile.com.