The Fall of the Han Dynasty
The Han Dynasty
The “golden age” of the Han Dynasty was a period of economic, cultural, and scientific growth, and it led to the creation of a Chinese identity. In this imperial dynasty the emperors all belonged to the Liu family. Their rule spread over two periods: the Western Han (206 BCE–9 CE) and the Eastern Han (25 CE–220 CE). Sure, there was a brief interruption between these two periods when Wang Mung managed to take over during a period of imperial decline, but his Xin Dynasty only lasted from 9 to 25 CE. So really it was still all about the Han in this era. At its height the Han emperors controlled approximately 2.5 million square miles of territory and ruled over nearly 60 million people. The emperor, or “huangdi,” was more than just a secular ruler. He was seen as closely connected to the divine world and respected by his people as a kind of spiritual being.
The collapse of the Han Dynasty
The Eastern Han emperors faced a variety of challenges, including natural disasters outside of their control, such as cattle plagues, locusts, droughts, floods, and earthquakes. The empire was strong enough to withstand the issues that it encountered for almost two hundred years, but over time the expenses became too great to bear. The end result is that by 220 CE the empire was torn apart into three kingdoms by warlords.
The Han and outsiders
Tribal groups living along China’s borders had a tense relationship with the Han, who thought that non-Han (Chinese) people were inherently inferior. The Han emperors saw themselves as “enlightened” bringers of peace and order to the tribes, even if it meant fighting them to do so. Problematic tribal groups would be resettled deeper in the empire. But because the Chinese despised these tribal groups, many officials had no problem mistreating and cheating them. Unfortunately for the Han, failing to integrate these tribal peoples meant that they were always a potential source of trouble for the empire.
In 89 CE, the Han defeated a large tribal group known as the Xiongnu and drove them away from China (they would become the Huns). What the Han had failed to realize was that the Xiongnu had been serving as a buffer against other dangerous tribes. Removing the Xiongnu opened the flood gates to invasion. Fighting off these tribal threats was a serious drain on Han resources.
Problems from within
The challenges were not all external. The Han also experienced internal struggles to maintain its rule. Taxation became an increasing problem by 100 CE. While the small farmers were the most stable tax base, local elites, who owned large estates, contributed less of their wealth and energy to the empire. Many small farmers gave up their land to work for local elites on their estates either willingly as tenants, or unwillingly as debt slaves. The wealthy were able to increase their productivity while the smaller farmers were able to avoid paying taxes. The empire, however, had less and less money to deal with new problems.
Throughout the first and second centuries CE, imperial eunuchs became a powerful group. The elites, who had previously benefited from being close to the emperor, felt threatened by this. Because eunuchs, men who have been castrated, had no children or wives, they could give all their loyalty to the empire. The elites were closely tied to their individual families, but the eunuchs’ power only came from their connection to the emperor. This powerful resource could be targeted. For example, when Emperor Huan died in 168 CE, a young boy (11 or 12 years old) from the ruling dynasty was made Emperor Ling. With that transition, a small group of elites hatched a plan to kill hundreds of eunuchs. They failed spectacularly—of the 3 leaders, one was thrown in prison and killed there and the other 2 committed suicide after losing to the eunuchs, and their severed heads were put on display. The eunuchs became even more powerful by attaching themselves tighter to the boy Emperor Ling. As for Emperor Ling, he was seen as a weak and corrupt ruler, and his reign was marked by rebellions and protests. One of the most dangerous was the Yellow Turban Revolt of 184 CE.
The Yellow Turban Revolt was a peasant rebellion, sparked by numerous outbreaks of a lethal plague throughout the 170s and 180s. As people died, they began to blame the emperor, believing he had the power to stop their suffering. But he was unable to provide a cure for the plague, and to make matters worse he also placed heavy taxes on his people. So instead, peasants believed they might find magical cures by turning to faith healers. One of these faith healers, Zhang Jue, was very successful and gained a huge following. By 184, Zhang Jue turned his movement into a violent uprising and led his followers to revolt against the Han. The army was able to defeat the rebels, but peasant rebellions continued to flare up over the next decade.
In 189 CE, Emperor Ling died without an heir. His thirteen-year-old son Liu Bian was proclaimed Emperor Shao by the dowager empress He. The dowager empress was the widowed wife of the dead emperor. Her family would select the next emperor and then the dowager would help rule if the new emperor was just a child. The dowager empress He’s brother, He Jin, immediately moved against the eunuchs. However the eunuchs lured He Jin into the palace and assassinated him. In a swift retaliation, some two thousand eunuchs were then killed in the palace by troops. This disruption allowed General Dong Zhou to seize control of the capital city of Luoyang. He overthrew the young emperor (and later forced him to commit suicide by drinking poison) and sat the eight-year-old Liu Xie on the throne as Emperor Xian. The general tried to control the government through this puppet emperor, but Dong Zhou was not well liked, and he was eventually killed in 192 CE by his bodyguard. The Han Empire quickly broke down as a series of warlords fought each other for control. One, Cao Cao, who had possession of the young emperor Xian, tried to unify China, but ultimately failed. After Cao Cao died in 220 CE, the emperor Xian was forced to give up his position, officially ending the Han Dynasty.
Theories of collapse
Chinese historians have spent well over a thousand years trying to understand why the Han Dynasty collapsed. Over time they developed three main theories: 1) bad rulers; 2) the influence of empresses and court eunuchs over child emperors too young to rule by themselves; and 3) the Yellow Turban Revolt. The first simply proposes that the Han fell because too many individual rulers were poor at their jobs. The second is based off the fact that most of the Eastern Han emperors died young, sometimes without clear heirs. It would be the dowager empresses (and their families) who would select the new emperor. These new emperors were typically young, requiring the dowager empresses to rule for them with the help of the eunuchs. For many Chinese, this went against the belief that power must come from a male. The third idea attributes the collapse to peasant rebellion directed against bad emperors.
Modern scholars offer many more theories. One argument says that the Han victory over Xiongnu was the beginning of the end. Some believe that only warfare could keep the generals loyal to the empire. When the Han forced the Xiongnu people to abandon the frontier, there were no more strong enemies to fight. The generals, like Dong Zhou, may have felt like lions at a vegetarian barbeque, and so turned their appetites on the empire. Others argue that a split emerged between the emperor and the scholars (literati) who actually ran the administration, and at the same time the peripheral areas of the empire became too strong for the emperor to control. Yet another theory suggests a divide between the empire and the wealthy, land-owning elites. Without the support and money of these elites, the emperors could not continue to respond to crises such as invasion, rebellion, and natural disasters.
Sources
Beck, B.J. Mansvelt. “The Fall of Han.” In D. Twitchett and J.K. Fairbank eds., The Cambridge History of China Volume 1: The Ch’in and Han Empires 221 B.C.-A.D. 220, 317-376. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
de Crespigny, Rafe. Fire Over Luoyang: A History of the Later Han Dynasty 23-220 AD. Leiden/Boston: Brill, 2017.
di Cosmo, N. Ancient China and Its Enemies: The Rise of Nomadic Power in East Asian History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 2002.
Hardy, G. and A.B. Kinney. The Establishment of the Han Empire and Imperial China. Westport, CT/London: Greenwood Press, 2005.
Hsu, Cho-yun. “The Role of the Literati and of Regionalism in the Fall of the Han Dynasty.” In N. Yoffee and G. L. Cowgill eds. The Collapse of Ancient States and Civilizations, 176-195. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1988.
Lewis, M.E. Early Chinese Empires: Qin and Han. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006.
Scheidel, W. ed. Rome and China: Comparative Perspectives on Ancient World Empires. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
Dennis RM Campbell
Dennis RM Campbell is an associate professor of History at San Francisco State University. He primarily conducts research on esoteric topics in ancient history and writes about ancient language, religions, and societies.
Image credits
This work is licensed under CC BY 4.0 except for the following:
Cover: A display of terracotta warriors unearthed from a site in Weishan, 02 December 2002, in Shandong Province, Northern China. Two villagers were planting trees in the area on 23 November when they found the ruins and reported it to local officials. It has been determined that the terracotta warriors date from the Han Dynasty (206 BC - 220 AD), a later period than China’s most famed terracotta warriors found in the ancient capital of Xian from the Qin Dynasty (221 BC - 207 BC). © AFP PHOTO STR / AFP / Getty Images
Map showing the extent of the Eastern Han empire compared to the size of modern China (outlined in orange). By Arab Hafez, Public Domain. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Han_Dynasty_206_BC_%E2%80%93_220.PNG#/media/File:Han_Dynasty_206_BC_%E2%80%93_220.PNG
Handscroll supposedly depicting various individuals, including tribal people bringing tribute to the Han emperor. By Walters Art Gallery, Public Domain. https://art.thewalters.org/detail/409/barbarians-and-envoys-bring-tribute-to-the-emperor/
Drawing depicting the likely fictional account of general Guan Yu chasing and then killing the Yellow Turban warrior Guan Hai. Guan Yu would go on to play an important role in the battles between the warlords in the last decades of the Han empire, Public Domain. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4b/Guan_Yu_slays_Guan_Hai.jpg
Map showing the breakdown of the Han empire as warlords carved out their own territories. Cao Cao (upper center) would try to reform the Han, but ultimately failed. By SY, CC BY-SA 4.0. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:End_of_Han_Dynasty_Warlords.png#/media/File:End_of_Han_Dynasty_Warlords.png
This painting on paper shows gentlemen involved in a discussion. Men like these would play an important role in running the empire, Public Domain. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gentlemen_in_conversation,_Eastern_Han_Dynasty.jpg
Articles leveled by Newsela have been adjusted along several dimensions of text complexity including sentence structure, vocabulary and organization. The number followed by L indicates the Lexile measure of the article. For more information on Lexile measures and how they correspond to grade levels: www.lexile.com/educators/understanding-lexile-measures/
To learn more about Newsela, visit www.newsela.com/about.
The Lexile® Framework for Reading evaluates reading ability and text complexity on the same developmental scale. Unlike other measurement systems, the Lexile Framework determines reading ability based on actual assessments, rather than generalized age or grade levels. Recognized as the standard for matching readers with texts, tens of millions of students worldwide receive a Lexile measure that helps them find targeted readings from the more than 100 million articles, books and websites that have been measured. Lexile measures connect learners of all ages with resources at the right level of challenge and monitors their progress toward state and national proficiency standards. More information about the Lexile® Framework can be found at www.Lexile.com.