Art and the World Wars
Introduction
What is “art”? There’s no single definition. But one way to look at it is as a mirror we hold up to society. Art reflects people’s experiences, thoughts, and feelings. It can help us understand our ever-changing world.
The two world wars of the twentieth century were enormous, dramatic, terrible periods. One of the ways people reacted to them was through creating art. Let’s look at some of those creations and consider what they tell us about people and war.
Art and the First World War
The First World War transformed the artistic world. Some of the art it produced was used to make people want to join the war effort. A great example is Australian artist Norman Lindsay’s posters, which tried to recruit men to the Australian forces fighting for Great Britain. Posters like Fight or Wait were both realistic and expressive. They aimed to produce an emotional response that made you want to fight.
Many states sent artists to the front lines to draw battlefields. A lot of art that emerged from the front lines detailed the terrible truth of war. It showed the dangers that soldiers faced. The artist George Harding accompanied the American forces in France. Harding sketched and painted the devastating scenes he witnessed. Traffic to Mont St. Père, for example, shows the destruction of a town by artillery and airplanes.
The First World War inspired poetry as well as visual art. Much of this poetry mourned the loss of life, destruction of property, and death of innocence. Some poets fought on the front lines, and several died in combat. Examples include Britain’s Siegfried Sassoon, Russia’s Ilya Ehrenburg, Germany’s Gerrit Engelke, and France’s Louis Pergaud. Female poets wrote about the war too. One example is Ada Harrison, whose poem New Year, 1916 is below:
Those that go down into silence. . .
There is no silence in their going down,
Although their grave-turf is not wet with tears,
Although Grief passes by them, and Renown
Has garnered them no glory for the years.
The cloud of war moves on, and men forget
That empires fall. We go our heedless ways
Unknowing still, uncaring still, and yet
The very dust is clamorous with their praise.
After the war, the world needed to heal from the years of death and destruction. This was especially true for the many millions of war veterans. Art reflected this struggle and was a way of coming to terms with the meaning and causes of the war. One particular school of art, the Dada movement, argued that the war was a result of the rise of science and a new emphasis on reason. These new ways of thinking had lessened the importance of humanity and emotion, these artists said. Dada art was meant to offend and ask hard questions. It ignored the often rigid rules of art, as can be seen in Hannah Höch’s Cut with the Kitchen Knife.
The Surrealist movement emerged alongside Dada. It began in Paris at the end of the war. This type of art expressed ideas, thoughts, and feelings directly, leaving “reality” behind. Surrealists generally felt that the First World War had been caused by people wanting to obey and conform, and its artists and poets stressed non-conformity. They fused together items and elements that others would not have thought belonged together. They also raised questions about whether the world we think we see is what really exists. A great example is René Magritte’s The Treachery of Images. It is an image of a pipe above the words Ceci n’est pas une pipe. (“This is not a pipe.”) And Magritte was right: it’s not a pipe, just a picture of a pipe. But he may also be suggesting that what we think we are experiencing in the world is just a representation or illusion of reality.
Art and the Second World War
The art of the period between the wars was both rich and chaotic. This was also a period of changing beliefs. The world saw a rise in fascism, authoritarianism, and communism. These were new ways to impose order in many countries. These political movements saw surreal art as too uncontrollable. Many leaders viewed this art as a serious threat. Once the Nazi party came to power in Germany, surrealistic and otherwise unapproved art was burned.
Recognizing the power of art, authoritarian governments also produced it. They sponsored art celebrating progress, organization, and obedience. One of the most important productions was Triumph of the Will. It was a film about Adolf Hitler made by German filmmaker Leni Riefenstahl in 1935. The film was a two-hour propaganda piece meant to show how the German people should celebrate Adolf Hitler as a man of action.
The war itself also led to an abundance of art. Some of it was overtly racist, like anti-Japanese pieces in the United States. Other countries also created a great deal of propaganda in the territories they took over or were trying to take over. They hoped art would convince populations to help them or to obey their rule. One great example is this Japanese leaflet from 1943. It is meant to convince Indian citizens not to join up to fight Japan.
Post-war art
In the United States and some other countries, the end of the war in 1945 transformed who could make art. Previously, art had not been a career many people could afford to pursue. But the GI Bill, which paid for veterans to go to university, allowed many more students than ever before to receive training in art. This led to many new types of creativity. One was “pop art,” a movement that challenged people’s ideas of who art was for and who could make it. Just the wealthy few, as usual? Or could anyone be an artist now? Andy Warhol’s 32 Campbell’s Soup Cans, which made art from an everyday product, perfectly expresses the questions pop art tried to raise. Can’t tell if it’s really art? That’s exactly what Warhol hoped you would think about!
Meanwhile, the Communist Party in China brought to power a new government. It also brought new ideas about the purpose of art. Party Chairman Mao Zedong directed that art be “a powerful weapon for uniting and educating the people, fighting and destroying the enemy.” Art that was considered not useful was outlawed. This was especially true for art influenced by European and US movements like Surrealism and pop art. The only art supported by the government was very realistic, pro-communist, and pro-government. The painting below is an example of the kind of work the government favored.
The end of the war laid the groundwork for decolonization. As European colonies fought to achieve independence, art aimed at liberation began to emerge around the world. We will leave you with one example, Sudanese artist Ibrahim El Salahi’s The Arising.
Sources
Slocombe, Richard. Art from the First World War. London: Imperial War Museums, 2014.
Bohm-Duchen, Monica. Art and the Second World War. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014.
World War I and the Visual Arts. Metropolitan Museum of Art Exhibit, July 31, 2017-January 27, 2018. Accessed May 24, 2020, https://www.metmuseum.org/exhibitions/listings/2017/world-war-i
Trevor Getz
Trevor Getz is a professor of African and world history at San Francisco State University. He has been the author or editor of 11 books, including the award-winning graphic history Abina and the Important Men, and has coproduced several prize-winning documentaries. Trevor is also the author of A Primer for Teaching African History, which explores questions about how we should teach the history of Africa in high school and university classes.
Image credits
This work is licensed under CC BY 4.0 except for the following:
Cover image: Going “over the top.” The soldiers scrambling over the trench parapet are Canadians. They are retaking the French village of Neuville-Vitasse from the Germans in August 1918. By Alfred Bastien. Courtesy of the Canadian War Museum, public domain.
Norman Lindsay, The Trumpet Calls, 1917. © Universal History Archive / Getty Images.
Traffic to Mont St. Pere, by George Harding, 1918. Courtesy of National Archives, public domain. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Traffic_to_Mont_St._Pere_by_George_Harding.jpg
Hannah Höch and Raoul Hausmann standing to the right of Höch’s Cut with the Kitchen Knife, Berlin, 1920. © Apic / Getty Images.
René Magritte, La Trahison des Images, 1928–1929. “Magritte and Contemporary Art: The Treachery of Images”, Los Angeles County Museum of Art, 2006. © Robyn Beck/AFP via Getty Images.
A 1935 movie poster of Triumph of the Will. © LMPC via Getty Images.
Japanese Propaganda leaflet, 1946. © Pictures From History / Universal Images Group via Getty Images.
Andy Warhol, 32 Campbell’s Soup Cans, 1962. Exhibition at Moma, New York, 2016. © Santi Visalli / Getty Images.
Get Together for Our Farm Industry, Like the People in Da Jai, 1976. © David Pollack / Corbis via Getty Images.
Ibrahim El Salahi, The Arising, undated. From the National Archives, 558994. https://catalog.archives.gov/id/558994
Articles leveled by Newsela have been adjusted along several dimensions of text complexity including sentence structure, vocabulary and organization. The number followed by L indicates the Lexile measure of the article. For more information on Lexile measures and how they correspond to grade levels: www.lexile.com/educators/understanding-lexile-measures/
To learn more about Newsela, visit www.newsela.com/about.
The Lexile® Framework for Reading evaluates reading ability and text complexity on the same developmental scale. Unlike other measurement systems, the Lexile Framework determines reading ability based on actual assessments, rather than generalized age or grade levels. Recognized as the standard for matching readers with texts, tens of millions of students worldwide receive a Lexile measure that helps them find targeted readings from the more than 100 million articles, books and websites that have been measured. Lexile measures connect learners of all ages with resources at the right level of challenge and monitors their progress toward state and national proficiency standards. More information about the Lexile® Framework can be found at www.Lexile.com.