Cookie Policy

Our website uses cookies to understand content and feature usage to drive site improvements over time. To learn more, review our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Decarbonization Solutions

Driving Question: How can we reduce emissions?

There are numerous solutions to reduce emissions in each of the Grand Challenges, but not all solutions are equal when it comes to avoiding the worst impacts of climate change. How will decision-makers in different communities and countries know where to focus energy, time, and resources? This lesson explores how we can evaluate solutions to maximize their impact and what we can do to get them into widespread use.

Learning Objectives:

  1. Evaluate decarbonization strategies.
  2. Identify the solutions most valuable to emissions reduction.
  3. Research a decarbonization strategy and advocate for its implementation.

Vocab Terms:

  • carbon capture and sequestration (CCS)
  • decarbonization
  • direct air capture (DAC)
  • hydroelectric power
  • nuclear energy
  • renewable energy
STEP 1

Opener: Decarbonization Solutions

Teaching Tools

To teach this lesson step, refer to page 2 of Lesson 4.2 Teaching Guide Locked .

What are the solutions for reducing emissions? These images will help you think about the most promising decarbonization strategies.

STEP 2

Reducing Emissions

Teaching Tools

To teach this lesson step, refer to page 3 of Lesson 4.2 Teaching Guide Locked .

Check out our Reading Guide External link to learn about the Three Close Read approach.

There are lots of options out there that might help decarbonize. How do we determine which ones are worth our time and resources? Read the article to learn more, and then use the activity to decide for yourself.

STEP 3

Can We Capture Emissions?

Teaching Tools

Use AI to check student blind spots:

  • First, they research and write their answers using class materials—no AI allowed.
  • Then, prompt ChatGPT to generate a pros and cons list of the technology. Challenge students to reflect on what they might have missed or misunderstood.
  • Wrap up with a class discussion: Did the AI offer new insights? How did its response compare to theirs in depth, accuracy, and perspective?

Expensive, complex, and…necessary? Use the infographic to explore for yourself the pros and cons of carbon capture, and then synthesize your thinking as you work through the activity.

STEP 4

Can We Make Electricity Without Fossil Fuels?

Teaching Tools

To teach this lesson step, refer to page 7 of Lesson 4.2 Teaching Guide Locked .

Looking for tips on using video in an instructionally sound way? Look no further than the OER Project Video Guide. External link

Electricity makes our modern lives possible—but can we make electricity without fossil fuels?

Can We Make Electricity Without Fossil Fuels? Crash Course Climate & Energy #3 External link

How can the electricity that powers your internet or midnight pizza come from carbon-free sources? Dig into ways we can decarbonize our electricity supply.

Key Ideas

As this video progresses, key ideas will be introduced to invoke discussion.
STEP 5

Investigating Decarbonization Solutions

Teaching Tools

To teach this lesson step, refer to page 8 of Lesson 4.2 Teaching Guide Locked .

Check out this blog postResearching BIG thorny problems External link – for insight on how to help students figure out effective solutions to climate change.

STEP 6

Closer: Decarbonization Solutions

Teaching Tools

To teach this lesson step, refer to page 10 of Lesson 4.2 Teaching Guide Locked .

STEP 7

DBQ: Climate Solutions

Teaching Tools

Human vs. Robot: Climate Solutions Showdown

  • Rather than debating each other, students take on an AI opponent. First, they prepare the traditional way—researching, gathering evidence, and building arguments without AI assistance.
  • Then, they prompt the AI to debate them on their chosen climate topic. Their challenge: Fact-check the AI in real time and evaluate the quality and creativity of its reasoning.
  • Wrap up with a class discussion: Did the AI present strong arguments? Did it challenge or deepen student thinking?