Art of the Paleolithic
Introduction
Humans are an artistic species. We paint, draw, and sculpt, and make music, television shows, and movies. All of these things are art. Humans are able to think abstractly. We imagine and create things that do not exist, like unicorns, monsters, and superheroes. We can also build on the achievements of earlier time periods. We make art that is grounded in history but is also new.
Art brings us together into shared communities and networks that have developed as a result of our creativity. As humans have produced different works of art, we have exchanged them for other goods. That's how artwork travels from one community to another. Through this exchange, people can learn about new techniques, improve upon them, and make new works of art. All of these artistic abilities and creations help to make human culture.
But when did humans first develop the cognitive (intellectual) abilities to create art? All people living today belong to the species Homo sapiens. Were we the only species to develop artistic abilities? Did earlier human species, or even other animal species, have them as well? What kinds of skills are needed before a species can create art?
These questions are not easy to answer. We have no written records from these periods. Few artifacts have survived. Still, archaeologists and anthropologists have offered several theories to try to answer these big questions.
The Paleolithic Cognitive Revolution
Many scholars agree that one key development made our species into fully modern humans. It is known as the Paleolithic Cognitive Revolution. At this point in time, humans developed the necessary brainpower to acquire language, think abstractly, and learn collectively. Collective learning is when two or more people learn, or try to learn, something together.
Thanks to this cognitive revolution, we became able to create music, art, and dance, and technology such as instruments, toys, tools, and weapons. Basically, these are all the qualities that we think of when we talk about modern human behavior and human culture. For many scholars, these characteristics separate humans from all other species.
From about the 1950s to today, archaeologists and anthropologists believed that these cognitive abilities developed with the evolution of Homo sapiens. Ours was the only human species to survive. Others whose brains did not develop the same way, such as Neanderthals, became extinct. Many believe our survival was made possible by those same cognitive abilities that allowed us to make words and art. That's why some of the products of this cognitive revolution include the development of language, collective learning, and the creation of symbolic art. All of these elements were present in Homo sapiens.
The Upper Paleolithic Cognitive Revolution: Cave Paintings and Venus Figurines
Cave paintings fit our current definition of art. They include paintings of humans and animals that might represent some religious or spiritual meaning, such as the examples shown in the images below. Another form of art that fits this definition are the three-dimensional figurines known as Venus figures. The very well-known Venus of Willendorf is one example. These figurines may have had some spiritual meaning, such as fertility or goddess symbols. Some scholars think they were representations of spirit animals.
These works of art might represent a cognitive revolution among the Homo sapiens who lived in the European regions we now call Spain and France. It was once thought that these cultural abilities resulted from a sudden intellectual shift that distinguished our species from all others. New research suggests, however, that these abilities might have developed slowly over a longer period of time.
Middle Paleolithic Art: Tools, Weapons, and Beads
To explore this idea, let's go back to the Middle Paleolithic period. This was the period of time between 300,000 and 50,000 years ago. Creative humans in this time used a red clay called ochre to paint their bodies. They made tools and weapons such as bows and arrows. Tools are not usually considered to be forms of art. Yet they do require the cognitive abilities to craft and improve.
Other early Paleolithic art was composed of geometric patterns, represented in the image below from Blombos Cave in South Africa. This period also saw the creation of beads made from shells. They were painted and strung into necklaces and other decorations. These types of art were created at least 75,000 years ago. That's about 30,000 years before the cave paintings. Therefore, it would seem that we must push back the time period for the cognitive revolution to include artistic humans living in the Middle Paleolithic. It was not just for the cave painters that existed during the Upper Paleolithic period.
Now, what about human species that developed tools long before this period, about 250,000 to 300,000 years ago? This was before the evolution of Homo sapiens. Would these species' accomplishments require us to extend the cognitive revolution back even further? What about early humans who made musical instruments or performed dances as part of rituals? These are certainly forms of artistic expression. They, too, would require symbolic thought and perhaps early language abilities.
And what about the Neanderthals? Recent finds in Spain from about 120,000 to 64,000 years ago show that they created cave paintings and made beads out of shells, too. This was long before the arrival of Homo sapiens in this region.
Conclusion
So, should our definition of what we consider to be art change to include these earliest forms of human creation? There is certainly evidence to suggest that tool-making should be considered a form of art. It takes skill and creativity to shape tools and weapons. As humans shared these skills through the process of collective learning, tools eventually improved. New innovations were discovered.
This, in turn, might indicate that cognitive abilities began long before the creation of cave paintings. That means the roots of humans' cognitive thinking could extend much further back than 40,000 or 50,000 years ago.
Sources
Balter, Michael. “New Light on Revolutions That Weren’t.” Science New Series 336, no. 6081 (2012): 530-531.
Frey, Ulrich, Charlotte Störmer, and Kai P. Willfür, eds. Homo Novus—A Human Without Illusions. New York: Springer, 2010.
Henshilwood, Christopher S., Francesco d’Errico, Royden Yates, Zenobia Jacobs, Chantal Tribolo, Geoff A. T. Duller, Norbert Mercier, Judith C. Sealy, Helene Valladas, Ian Watts, and Ann G. Wintle. “Emergence of Modern Human Behavior: Middle Stone Age Engravings from South Africa.” Science 295, no. 5558 (2002): 1278-1280.
McBrearty, Sally. “Advances in the Study of the Origin of Humanness.” Journal of Anthropological Research 69, no. 1 (2013): 7-13.
Morriss-Kay, Gillian M. “The Evolution of Human Artistic Creativity.” Journal of Anatomy 216, no. 2 (2010): 158-176.
Robb, John. “Prehistoric Art in Europe: A Deep-Time Social History.” American Antiquity 80, no. 4 (2015): 635-654.
Bridgette Byrd O’Connor
Bridgette Byrd O’Connor holds a DPhil in history from the University of Oxford and taught the Big History Project and World History Project courses and AP US government and politics for 10 years at the high-school level. In addition, she’s been a freelance writer and editor for the Crash Course World History and US History curricula. She’s currently a content manager for the OER Project.
Image credits
This work is licensed under CC BY 4.0 except for the following:
Cover: Paleolithic art made by the inhabitants of France 35,000 years ago. Remains found near town of Aurignac, Haute- Garonne, France. © Culture Club/Getty Images
Flute made of vulture bone from Germany, c. 35,000 years ago. By José-Manuel Benito Álvarez, CC BY-SA 2.5. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Flauta_paleol%C3%ADtica.jpg#/media/File:Flauta_paleol%C3%ADtica.jpg
Cave paintings at Lascaux, France. By Prof saxx, public domain. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lascaux_painting.jpg#/media/File:Lascaux_painting.jpg
Venus of Hohle Fels, c. 35,000 years ago, terracotta. By Ramessos, CC BY-SA 3.0. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus_ figurines#/media/File:VenusHohlefels2.jpg
Venus of Willendorf, c. 30,000 BCE, limestone. By Oke, CC BY-SA 3.0. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus_figurines#/media/ File:Wien_NHM_Venus_von_Willendorf.jpg
Venus of Dolní Věstonice, c. 29,000-25,000 BCE, ceramic. By Petr Novák, CC BY-SA 2.5. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus_ figurines#/media/File:Vestonicka_venuse_edit.jpg
Replica of the lion painting in the Chauvet Cave, France. By HTO, public domain. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lions_painting,_Chauvet_Cave_(museum_replica).jpg#/media/File:Lions_painting,_Chauvet_Cave_(museum_replica).jpg
Rock art from Blombos Cave, South Africa, c. 73,000 years ago. By originalrockart, CC BY-SA 4.0. https://commons.wikimedia. org/wiki/File:Blombos_Cave_-_3.jpg#/media/File:Blombos_Cave_-_3.jpg
Flaked points from Blombos Cave, South Africa, c. 71,000 BCE. By Vincent Mourre, CC BY-SA 3.0. https://commons.wikimedia. org/wiki/File:Blombos_point.JPG#/media/File:Blombos_point.JPG
Articles leveled by Newsela have been adjusted along several dimensions of text complexity including sentence structure, vocabulary and organization. The number followed by L indicates the Lexile measure of the article. For more information on Lexile measures and how they correspond to grade levels: www.lexile.com/educators/understanding-lexile-measures/
To learn more about Newsela, visit www.newsela.com/about.
The Lexile® Framework for Reading evaluates reading ability and text complexity on the same developmental scale. Unlike other measurement systems, the Lexile Framework determines reading ability based on actual assessments, rather than generalized age or grade levels. Recognized as the standard for matching readers with texts, tens of millions of students worldwide receive a Lexile measure that helps them find targeted readings from the more than 100 million articles, books and websites that have been measured. Lexile measures connect learners of all ages with resources at the right level of challenge and monitors their progress toward state and national proficiency standards. More information about the Lexile® Framework can be found at www.Lexile.com.