Human Communities Populate the Earth
Introduction: human evolution and interactions
It was a time without cars or phones or even wheels. Imagine yourself 15,000 years in the past. You are a forager (hunter-gatherer) trekking across great distances in search of food. Now imagine how groups of foragers might have lived as they moved into these new territories. How did people come to inhabit almost all areas of the world at this time? And how do we know about their movements and way of life?
Various scholars have helped us learn about human origins and migration patterns: archaeologists, anthropologists, climatologists, geneticists, historians, linguists, and paleobotanists are a few. Most would agree that modern humans, Homo sapiens, evolved in Africa approximately 300,000 to 200,000 years ago. But we weren’t the only human species around back then. Homo neanderthalensis (Neanderthals), Homo erectus, and Homo floresiensis existed in other communities in various regions of Afro-Eurasia. But Homo sapiens are the only human species that are still alive today. Homo sapiens have a smaller build than earlier human species and have a distinctly shaped skull. You can see this in the image below comparing a Homo sapiens skull and a Neanderthal skull. Evidence of our earliest existence comes from fossils found in Ethiopia about 200,000 years ago. But some researchers think that our species was around for longer than this.
Debate continues around whether Homo sapiens encountered all of these species as they migrated out of Africa approximately 80,000 to 60,000 years ago. These migrations probably occurred at various times and to different places, not all at one time. New evidence suggests that the earliest date for these migrations may be 120,000 years ago. There is evidence that Homo sapiens interacted and reproduced with Neanderthals. The Neanderthals mainly lived in colder climates, had a heavier build, and their foreheads were more sloped with a more pronounced ridge at the front. Their interactions are why some modern humans have traces of Neanderthal DNA. In addition, new studies show that some Homo sapiens mixed with both Neanderthal and another human species known as Denisovans in Central Asia and Australia (Bae, et al). Denisovans are a more recently discovered human species that mainly lived in the area of modern-day Siberia. They interacted and reproduced with Neanderthals, too.
Human communities on the move
Communities of Homo sapiens began journeying outside of Africa thousands of years ago, but we don’t know exactly when. Eventually, other human species died out. This could have been a result of mixing with Homo sapiens communities, through violent clashes with modern humans, or due to other effects such as climate and environmental changes. All of these early human communities were nomadic foragers, or people who moved around to follow their food. Foragers lived off the land by gathering, hunting, and fishing. Archaeologists and anthropologists believe that foraging communities were likely kept rather small, no more than 20-50 people. These humans primarily used stone and bone tools. For this reason, archaeologists and historians have categorized the period as the Paleolithic era (Old Stone Age). Population numbers probably remained relatively small throughout the Paleolithic era. These human communities may have intentionally kept their population growth rates low so they could move more easily. It would be very difficult to carry multiple children at one time while searching for food sources.
These small groups collected food and resources from one area and then moved to another as food became scarce. They interacted with other communities and established networks of exchange to trade items they gathered or made. In addition, language networks connected people who lived in nearby areas so that information was shared amongst groups. Some members of one community left to join others in order to have children. Larger networks of people also came together for spiritual or religious purposes.
Over time, some groups migrated outside of Africa. Climate changes, scarcity of resources, human curiosity, or conflicts with other groups could have all caused this change.
Humans began moving perhaps as early as 120,000 years ago and probably in waves that occurred to different regions at different time periods. The earliest migrations might have occurred along the coasts of the Arabian Peninsula into India and then on to Southeast Asia. These groups stayed near the coastline because there was an abundance of resources such as marine life to sustain them. Early humans constructed rafts or small dugout boats to maneuver across larger expanses of water. By about 50,000 to 45,000 years ago, these communities reached Papua New Guinea, Australia, and East Asia. Recent evidence suggests that humans’ arrival in Australia may be much earlier than this. Some studies push the date back to 65,000 years ago (Clarkson et al., 2017).
Evidence also shows that other groups left Africa and took a more northerly route through the Arabian Peninsula and entered Europe and Central Asia by about 45,000 years ago. Some communities had migrated and adapted to much colder climates in northern Asia. They journeyed across the Bering Strait by as early as 20,000 years ago. Small groups may have then traveled along the coasts and into the Americas from about 15,000 years ago. Still others may have waited until the climate became warmer to journey by land into the Americas about 12,000 to 10,000 years ago. Regardless of the route taken, early humans made their way down to the southern tip of South America by about 15,000 to 10,000 years ago. The fast pace of migration through the Americas was the result of an abundance of resources, both from marine life and large game animals. Many of these large game animals that were living in the Americas were eventually wiped out as humans moved across the continents.
Human communities and the environment
As human communities migrated, the environment affected not only how these humans lived but also how they looked. Humans adapted to new environmental conditions as they moved around and populated the Earth. One reason they achieved success living in varied climates was because of collective learning, or the sharing and preserving of information across generations. As humans learned new ways of dealing with their environment, they shared this information with others in their communities. These tools and techniques for survival were then passed down from generation to generation. Collective learning is, therefore, what allowed our human ancestors to populate the Earth. By sharing and preserving knowledge across generations, humans made significant improvements to how they lived and survived.
But as humans moved, they changed. there were slight, random mutations to DNA that occurred as humans lived in certain areas for longer periods of time. These random mutations account for the differences that you see in humans today. We are all of the same species but have slightly different appearances such as skin and hair color, or the shape of our eyes and noses. For example, humans who migrated to colder climates needed more vitamin D from the Sun. On the other hand humans living near the equator needed more protection from the sun. Over thousands of years, these humans experienced random genetic mutations. Through these they gained some advantages when adapting to their new environments. Some, for example, saw their skin color lighten, through a decrease in their skin pigment called melanin, to allow more of the Sun’s rays to penetrate skin and provide more nourishing vitamin D. In fact, this process was happening before modern humans ever left Africa (Crawford, et al. 2017).
Humans also impacted their environments as they migrated. They hunted animals, some to the point of extinction. They set fire to wooded areas in order to drive out wildlife and more easily hunt. Their movements impacted the environment and continue to do so in different ways today.
Conclusion
The story of the origins of humans and their migration patterns out of Africa are in an almost constant state of change. This shows collective learning at work as scholars continually make new discoveries that lead to revisions in the history of humanity. We know broadly the time, place, and manner of movements but the specifics are still being identified. As more fossils, tools, and genetic evidence are discovered, the story of early human communities may change multiple times. But academic discussions and validation of evidence through multiple disciplines and sources will continue. So, the story of our ancient past may become clearer in the very near future.
Sources
Bae, Christopher J., Katerina Douka, and Michael D. Petraglia. “On the origin of modern humans: Asian perspectives.” Science 358, no. 1269 (2017). Accessed March 18, 2019. http://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/358/6368/eaai9067.full.pdf
Bower, Bruce. “Stone tools hint at earlier human exit from Africa.” Science News 179, no. 5 (2011): 5-6.
Clarkson, C., Z. Jacobs, B. Marwick, R. Fullagar, L. Wallis, M. Smith, R.G. Roberts, et al. “Human occupation of northern Australia by 65,000 years ago.” Nature 547, no. 7663 (2017): 306-310.
Crawford, Nicholas G., Derek E. Kelly, Matthew E. B. Hansen, Marcia H. Beltrame, Shaohua Fan, Shanna L. Bowman, Ethan Jewett, et al. “Loci associated with skin pigmentation identified in African populations.” Science 358, no. 6365 (2017).
Dillehay, Tom D. “Climate and Human Migration.” Science, New Series, 298, no. 5594 (2002): 764-765.
Dillehay, Tom D. and Jeremy A. Sabloff. “Probing Deeper into First American Studies.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106, no. 4 (2009): 971-978.
Groucutt, Huw S., Rainer Grun, Iyad A. S. Zalmout, Nick A. Drake, Simon J. Armitage, Ian Candy, Richard Clark-Wilson, et al. “Homo sapiens in Arabia by 85,000 years ago.” Nature Ecology & Evolution 2, (2018): 800-809.
Genographic Project. “Map of Human Migration.” National Geographic. Accessed March 18, 2019. https://genographic.nationalgeographic.com/human-journey/
Harcourt, Alexander H. “Human phylogeography and diversity.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113, no. 29 (2016): 8072-8078.
Manning, Patrick. “Homo sapiens Populates the Earth: A Provisional Synthesis, Privileging Linguistic Evidence.” Journal of World History 17, no. 2 (2006): 115-158.
Smithsonian Institution. “What does it mean to be human?” Smithsonian. Accessed March 18, 2019. http://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/genetics/human-skin-color-variation/modern-human-diversity-skin-color
Bridgette Byrd O’Connor
Bridgette Byrd O’Connor holds a DPhil in history from the University of Oxford and taught the Big History Project and World History Project courses and AP US government and politics for 10 years at the high-school level. In addition, she’s been a freelance writer and editor for the Crash Course World History and US History curricula. She’s currently a content manager for the OER Project.
Image credits
This work is licensed under CC BY 4.0 except for the following:
Cover: Replica painting from the Cave of Altamira. © Universal History Archive / Universal Images Group / Getty Images
Comparison of a Homo sapiens skull on the left and a Homo neanderthalensis skull on the right. By Dr. Mike Baxter, CC BY-SA 2.0. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sapiens_neanderthal_comparison_en_blackbackground.png#/media/ File:Sapiens_neanderthal_comparison_en_blackbackground.png
Dispersal routes of early humans. By WHP and Katrin Emery, CC BY-NC 4.0. https://kemery.ca
Columbian Mammoth, an animal that was hunted to extinction by early humans as they moved into the Americas. By National Park Service, public domain. https://www.nps.gov/whsa/learn/nature/mammoth.htm
Articles leveled by Newsela have been adjusted along several dimensions of text complexity including sentence structure, vocabulary and organization. The number followed by L indicates the Lexile measure of the article. For more information on Lexile measures and how they correspond to grade levels: www.lexile.com/educators/understanding-lexile-measures/
To learn more about Newsela, visit www.newsela.com/about.
The Lexile® Framework for Reading evaluates reading ability and text complexity on the same developmental scale. Unlike other measurement systems, the Lexile Framework determines reading ability based on actual assessments, rather than generalized age or grade levels. Recognized as the standard for matching readers with texts, tens of millions of students worldwide receive a Lexile measure that helps them find targeted readings from the more than 100 million articles, books and websites that have been measured. Lexile measures connect learners of all ages with resources at the right level of challenge and monitors their progress toward state and national proficiency standards. More information about the Lexile® Framework can be found at www.Lexile.com.