The Caliphate
The center of the world
Around 1000 CE, Baghdad felt like the heart of the known world. A the time, it was one of the greatest cities on the planet. It had about a million residents, which in proportion to today’s population would look like 26 million. It was wealthy and home to many kinds of people, with thriving trade, sciences, and arts. Baghdad was a beautiful city rivaled only by Hangzhou in Song China.
The city rose to these heights as the seat of the Abbasid Caliphate. It was a powerful and large Muslim empire that lasted from 750 CE to 1258 CE. Starting around the eighth century, Muslim empires spread out across Afro-Eurasia. It all started in the middle of the seventh century with a new political structure called the caliphate.
The institution of the caliphate
After the death of the Muslim prophet Muhammad in 632 CE, the Muslim community of Arabia was led by a caliph.1 The caliph was to be a spiritual and political leader, elected by his fellow Muslims. The Rashidun Caliphate lasted from 632 to 661. During this time, the Muslim community elected caliphs who were related to Muhammad or were among his closest supporters.
Under the Rashidun, the state expanded quickly out of Arabia. The neighboring Byzantines and Persians were at risk. Disease, wars, and rival Central Asian groups made them weak, and these empires weren’t able to put up much of a fight. Many Arab soldiers once fought in the Byzantine and Persian armies. They knew their weaknesses so they could conquer them quickly.
However, the state itself was still a loose group of Arab tribes settled in garrison cities2 protected by troops. Then came the Umayyads, who ruled from 661 to 750. Under the Umayyads, the caliphate developed a more complex state structure to rule over its vast land. The empire then stretched from Spain to Central Asia. That’s a lot of territory! State officials began translating Persian and Byzantine sources into Arabic. Many of these sources were about how to manage an empire this large.
As the emerging caliphates grew, they were influenced by Persian and Byzantine political structures. The caliph became a ruler with complete power. That power was passed down to his children. The caliph ruled over subjects, much like a Persian king, and less like an elected leader of a community of fellow Muslims. Muslim scholars disagreed with their use of religion to gain power.
From an Arab empire to a Muslim empire
Soon, the caliphs were focused more on ruling than on safeguarding the religion. We often think of the political spread of the Islamic state and the spread of the Islamic religion as the same thing. In fact, caliphs most often did not encourage conquered people to convert to Islam. Non-Muslims could often retain their own religions. They were required to pay a special tax, called a jizya, a source of income for the state.
Arabs were not willing to share their power, though. They remained the ruling class. Many resented the Umayyads and questioned their authority. After all, they were neither elected nor members of Muhammad’s family. To make matters worse, people thought they acted unjustly and broke from Islamic ideals, including equal treatment for all Muslims, Arab or not.
One revolution later, and the Umayyads were out. They were replaced by the Abbasids, who ruled from 750 to 1258. They were related to Muhammad through his uncle. Though the Abbasids were Arab, the empire became a lot less Arab-centered under their rule.
The Abbasids were powerful monarchs, just as the Umayyads were. They weren’t fairer or more Islamic, either. They did, however, create more space for non-Arabs, and many Turks and Persians held sway at the Abbasid court. Also, many Central Asian boys were captured and brought into the area by the Abbasids, who raised them and used them as enslaved soldiers, called mamluks, to ensure a loyal military.
Society under the caliphate
It’s easy to forget that most people living in the empires were not actually Muslims. At least not right away. People were generally not forced to become Muslims, and for the most part, people converted individually for different reasons. These included sincere belief, avoiding the jizya tax, or gaining rights and privileges.
Muslims ruled over many Christians, Jews, Zoroastrians, and Hindus. Many non-Muslim people moved into the empire as enslaved people, often as prisoners of war or through trade. Enslaved men were often soldiers. Enslaved women were often concubines,3 a practice that became more common during Abbasid rule. This affected the structure of families and the status of women. Slavery was not passed down to children, and people could gain freedom and eventually gain considerable power.
Women’s lives were as different as the many societies Islam reached. Islam gave women rights, including property rights, inheritance rights, and the choice to marry.
Women had their own social and economic networks within their private spheres. Women could direct the building of mosques and schools using their own money. They also could buy and sell products and services in their homes.
Women’s rights were put into practice differently depending on region and social class, though. Over time, Islamic texts were often understood in ways that gave men more control. Former Byzantine and Persian areas were more restrictive for women. They covered their bodies in loose outer garments when in public. In other places, such as coastal East Africa or Southeast Asia, Muslim women were less restricted.
From one empire to many
On paper the Abbasids lasted until the thirteenth century when the Mongols sacked Baghdad. However, the truth is that their power declined around the tenth century for a number of reasons. For one, while more people becoming Muslim was good for the religious community, it wasn’t so good for the empire’s finances. There were a lot fewer people paying the jizya. The empire also became so big that it was hard to control. Some governors started taking taxes and revenues for themselves.
And remember those mamluks? It turns out that enslaved soldiers aren’t all that loyal. They eventually gained the power to influence who became caliph. Mamluks became “kingmakers” and, eventually, they started their own dynasties in various regions of the caliphate, in particular Egypt.
Over time, much of the Abbasid land was actually controlled by a number of independent Muslim dynasties, including mamluk-ruled ones. Many of these were devastated by Mongol invasions, while others survived. The Mongol invasions didn’t end the era of Muslim empires, though. In fact, some Mongols converted to Islam and started their own Muslim dynasties.
With so many different dynasties, you’d think the era of a unified Muslim community was entirely over. That wasn’t really true, though. Several things united Muslims. Trade networks crisscrossed the Muslim world, pulling areas into shared systems of production and distribution. Whether in west Africa, north India, or Baghdad, many Muslims in this era lived in wealthy, highly developed societies. They continued to feel they were at the center of the world.
1 A caliph was the leader of the caliphate. The word comes from the Arabic word khalifa, basically meaning a deputy or successor to the Prophet Muhammad.
2 A garrison city is one that is protected by troops.
3 A concubine is a live-in companion, usually sexual, in a polygamous relationship. Concubines are treated as having lower status than wives.
Sources
Arjomand, Said Amir. “Thinking Globally about Islam.” In Thinking Globally: A Global Studies Reader, edited by Mark Juergensmeyer, 79-84. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2014.
Ashtor, Eliyahu. “Banking Instruments Between the Muslim East and the Christian West.” Journal of European Economic History 1 (1972): 553-73.
Berkey, Jonathan Porter. The Formation of Islam: Religion and Society in the Near East, 600-1800. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
Cook, Michael, ed. The New Cambridge History of Islam. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Hodgson, Marshall. The Venture of Islam Conscience and History in a World Civilization. Volume 1: The Classical Age of Islam. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977.
Hoyland, Robert G. In God’s Path: The Arab Conquests and the Creation of an Islamic Empire. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.
Laine, James W. Meta-Religion: Religion and Power in World History. Oakland, CA: University of California Press, 2014.
Lapidus, Ira M. A History of Islamic Societies. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
———. Islamic Societies to the Nineteenth Century: A Global History. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Lieber, Alfred E. “Eastern Business Practices and Medieval European Commerce.” The Economic History Review 21, no. 2 (1968): 230–43.
McKay, John P. et al. A History of World Societies. Boston: Bedford Saint Martins, 2014.
Michalopoulos, Stelios, Alireza Naghavi, and Giovanni Prarolo. “Trade and Geography in the Spread of Islam.” The Economic Journal 128, no. 616 (2018): 3210–41.
Quinn, Stephen F. and William Roberds. “The Evolution of the Check as a Means of Payment: A Historical Survey.” Economic Review 93, no. 4 (2008).
Robinson, Chase F. “The First Islamic Empire.” In The Oxford Handbook of the State in the Ancient Near East and Mediterranean, edited by Peter Fibiger Bang and Walter Scheidel, 518-37. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Silverstein, Adam J. Islamic History: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
Super, John C. and Briane K. Turley. Religion in World History: The Persistence of Imperial Communion. New York: Routledge, 2006.
Udovitch, Abraham L. Bankers without Banks: Commerce, Banking, and Society in the Islamic World of the Middle Ages. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University, 1981.
Valérian, Dominique. “Middle East: 7th–15th Centuries.” The Oxford Handbook of Cities in World History, edited by Peter Clark, 258-74. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
Eman M. Elshaikh
The author of this article is Eman M. Elshaikh. She is a writer, researcher, and teacher who has taught K-12 and undergraduates in the United States and in the Middle East and written for many different audiences. She teaches writing at the University of Chicago, where she also completed her master’s in social sciences and is currently pursuing her PhD. She was previously a World History Fellow at Khan Academy, where she worked closely with the College Board to develop curriculum for AP World History.
Image credits
This work is licensed under CC BY 4.0 except for the following:
Cover: Arab life during the Abbasidian times - miniatures from the Maqamat of al-Hariri. Abassid caliphate (758-1258) © Photo by Culture Club / Getty Images
The city of Baghdad between 150 and 300 AH (767 and 912 CE). By William Muir, public domain. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Baghdad#/media/File:Baghdad_150_to_300_AH.png
A map showing the expansion of Muslim-ruled states from 622-750 CE. Dark red shows expansion under Muhammad, 622-623. Orange shows expansion under the Rashidun Caliphate, 632-661. Yellow shows expansion under the Umayyad Caliphate, 661-750. Public domain. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caliphate#/media/File:Map_of_expansion_of_Caliphate.svg
Depiction of the first Abbasid caliph As-Saffah as he receives pledges of allegiance in Kufa, the site of Umayyad opposition. From a work by Persian historian Muhammad Bal’ami, public domain. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Balami_-_Tarikhnama_-_Abu%27l-%27Abbas_al-Saffah_is_proclaimed_the_first_%27Abbasid_Caliph_(cropped).jpg
Rabi´a al-Basri (717–801 CE), a female Sufi saint who was revered for her intense devotion. Public domain. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rabia_al-Adawiyya.jpg
Gold dinar coin from the Berber Muslim Almoravid dynasty (1040-147), Seville, Spain, 1116, CC BY-SA 3.0. By PHGCOM, CC BY-SA 3.0. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almoravid_dynasty#/media/File:Almoravid_gold_dinar_coin_from_Seville,_Spain,_1116_British_Museum.png
Articles leveled by Newsela have been adjusted along several dimensions of text complexity including sentence structure, vocabulary and organization. The number followed by L indicates the Lexile measure of the article. For more information on Lexile measures and how they correspond to grade levels: www.lexile.com/educators/understanding-lexile-measures/
To learn more about Newsela, visit www.newsela.com/about.
The Lexile® Framework for Reading evaluates reading ability and text complexity on the same developmental scale. Unlike other measurement systems, the Lexile Framework determines reading ability based on actual assessments, rather than generalized age or grade levels. Recognized as the standard for matching readers with texts, tens of millions of students worldwide receive a Lexile measure that helps them find targeted readings from the more than 100 million articles, books and websites that have been measured. Lexile measures connect learners of all ages with resources at the right level of challenge and monitors their progress toward state and national proficiency standards. More information about the Lexile® Framework can be found at www.Lexile.com.