The Berlin Conference

By Trevor Getz
The Berlin Conference gathered a bunch of Europeans to plot ways to divide up Africa. It may not have been the “start” of colonialism, but it sure accelerated the process.

Cookie Policy

Our website uses cookies to understand content and feature usage to drive site improvements over time. To learn more, review our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Painting of an ornate room full of men wearing military uniforms conversing and shaking hands.

A picture worth 1000 words

They say a picture is worth a thousand words. Look below at the image of the Berlin conference of 1884– 1885. It was a conference about Africa, but happening in a room in Berlin, Germany. There were zero Africans, and only two of the attendees had ever stepped foot on that continent. The conference included European men representing 12 countries in Europe, plus one representative from America and one from the Ottoman Empire. The room was dominated by a gigantic map of Africa. The men at the conference had decided it was their job, and their right, to divide up Africa between their countries.

Drawing of a room full of men, most seated at a long table, talking and looking over papers.
The Berlin Conference, November 1884 to February 1885, Germany. © Getty Images.

Leopold’s big swindle

The immediate reason for the conference was the jealousy of King Leopold II of Belgium. The king was jealous of his cousin, Queen Victoria of Great Britain. King Leopold II of Belgium considered himself to be an important man. However, in the 1870s, the only territory Leopold ruled was the small state of Belgium. Queen Victoria was the Queen of Great Britain and, also, the Empress of India. She had a whole empire.

Leopold set out to get an empire. Leopold pretended to be a humanitarian and an abolitionist. He tricked Africans and Europeans. He claimed a huge territory in Central Africa, and called it the “Congo Free State,” declaring that he would allow free trade and eliminate slavery there. Instead, he built a state that worked the local population for his own profit.

Although Leopold deceived most Europeans for a while, his fellow rulers caught on. The French sent out expeditions to claim the territory to the north. The British convinced Portugal to expand their claims to the territory to the south in order to block Leopold.

Illustration of the Belgian Congo in 1896, with several shaded areas.
Map of the “Belgian Congo,” which began as the “Congo Free State,” King Leopold II’s personal territory. Note Portuguese Angola to the south and French Equatorial Africa to the north. © Getty Images.

The race for control in the Congo region was just one of many in the 1880s, as Europeans sought to violently conquer African societies. Soon they fought each other. The German Chancellor, Otto von Bismarck, believed that this threatened his plans for Europe. He invited European leaders to come to Berlin in 1884. The goal was to work out a policy for Europe’s expansion in Africa.

The Conference

The Berlin Conference took place from November 15, 1884, to February 26, 1885. It resulted in an act that did three things. The first thing it did was recognize the territory that King Leopold claimed as his private property. The second thing it did was recognize other existing territorial claims in Africa. 

The third result of the conference was a process for Europeans to claim territory in Africa. European countries set up a plan that would send out explorers. These explorers would offer treaties to local African leaders claiming that their respective European countries would offer “protection.” Leaders would sign these treaties, which were actually deceptions. The explorers submitted the treaty to their European governments. The government of each country negotiated with other European states to recognize that this “protection” meant ownership of the territory.

This was all a scam. The treaties were often meaningless. They were usually printed in English or French, and often the local leaders didn’t know what they said. Sometimes, the explorers would get anyone to sign the treaty, including leaders who didn’t really have the power to sign them. The whole process was based on racist ideas: that this land was “unclaimed,” and that local societies could not rule themselves.

Menelik in the middle

An elaborately dressed Emperor of Ethiopia, Menelik II with government dignitaries in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Menelik II, Emperor of Ethiopia. Photo from L’Illustrazione Italiana, XXXVI, no. 7, February 14, 1909. © Getty Images.

One African leader who figured this out early was Menelik II, the future Emperor of Ethiopia. In 1884, Menelik was an important leader of Ethiopia. He knew about the conference, although neither he nor any other African leader had been invited.

Menelik wrote a letter to the states at the conference, asking them to take Ethiopia seriously as a military and political power. He wrote, “I have no intention at all of being an indifferent spectator, if the distant Powers hold onto the idea of dividing up Africa… Since the All-Powerful has protected Ethiopia up until now, I am hopeful that he will keep and enlarge it also in the future, and I do not think for a moment that He [God] will divide Ethiopia among the other Powers.”1

Menelik was in an interesting position. Ethiopia was a powerful state that was looking to build an empire of its own in the surrounding territory. However, they knew that Europeans were dividing up the continent and they feared being divided themselves. The Ethiopians could clearly see that Italy, Britain, and France all wanted to claim nearby territory. Ethiopian leaders wanted to claim that territory for themselves.

Menelik’s letter was largely ignored. Although Ethiopia escaped “protection,” the Europeans went about chopping up the rest of the continent among themselves.

Continuity and change

How important was the Berlin Conference? To what degree did it lead to change, including the colonization of Africa? Historians and legal scholars who study these questions don’t all agree on the answers. Look at the two maps below. They show different ways to answer the question.

Two maps side by side of the African continent. The map on the left reads 1880 and has many small territories and lots of grey space. The map on the right has several large territories with straight borders covering the entire continent.
Africa, 1871 (prior to the conference) and 1914 (post conference). Note that in the 1871 map, European nations controlled just a few regions along the coast, but by 1914, European nations controlled all of Africa except Liberia and Ethiopia. © OER Project.

The map on the left shows that many regions of Africa had already been claimed by Europeans by 1880, four years before the conference. In North Africa, France had conquered Algeria. Italy was already partially controlling Libya. Britain had a great deal of power over Egypt. In the West, there are small colonies like French Senegal and British Gold Coast and Sierra Leone. In southern Africa, there are Portuguese territories of Angola and Mozambique. Even further south is the Cape Colony, ruled by Britain. On the one hand, lots of colonization was already happening prior to the Berlin Conference.

These colonies were still small, though. Contrast this with the map of Africa in 1913. In this second map, all of Africa’s nearly twelve million square miles is colonized by European states, except for Ethiopia and the tiny state of Liberia. This vast territory was acquired after the conference.

The Berlin Conference established the legal claim by Europeans that all of Africa could be occupied by whoever could take it. It also established a process for Europeans to cooperate, rather than fight amongst themselves. This cooperation played a huge role in the division and conquest of Africa. It was a form of legal violence exercised upon the whole continent. In this way, the Berlin Conference was a significant event in world history.




1 A. Adu Boahen, African Perspectives on Colonialism, (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989), 25.

Sources

Bragg, Melvyn. “The Berlin Conference.” Produced by BBC4. In Our Time. October 31, 2013. Podcast, MP3 audio, 42:00. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b03ffkfd

Boahen, A. Adu. African Perspectives on Colonialism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989.

Mackenzie, John. The Partition of Africa: And European Imperialism 1880–1900. New York: Routledge, 1983.

Trevor Getz

Trevor Getz is a professor of African and world history at San Francisco State University. He has been the author or editor of 11 books, including the award-winning graphic history Abina and the Important Men, and has coproduced several prize-winning documentaries. Trevor is also the author of A Primer for Teaching African History, which explores questions about how we should teach the history of Africa in high school and university classes.

Image credits

Creative Commons This work is licensed under CC BY 4.0 except for the following:

Cover image: Congress of Berlin, 13 July 1878, after the painting by Anton von Werner. © Stefano Bianchetti/Corbis via Getty Images.

The Berlin Conference, November 1884 to February 1885, Germany. © Photo12/UIG/Getty Images.

Map of the “Belgian Congo,” which began as the “Congo Free State,” King Leopold II’s personal territory. Note Portuguese Angola to the south and French Equatorial Africa to the north. Illustration by J Lebegue, 1896. ©Buyenlarge/Getty Images.

Menelik II, Emperor of Ethiopia. Photo from L’Illustrazione Italiana, XXXVI, no. 7, February 14, 1909. ©DEA/Biblioteca Ambrosiana/Getty Images.

Africa, 1871 (prior to the conference) and 1914 (post conference). Note that in the 1871 map, European nations controlled just a few regions along the coast, but by 1914, European nations controlled all of Africa except Liberia and Ethiopia. © OER Project.


Newsela

Articles leveled by Newsela have been adjusted along several dimensions of text complexity including sentence structure, vocabulary and organization. The number followed by L indicates the Lexile measure of the article. For more information on Lexile measures and how they correspond to grade levels: www.lexile.com/educators/understanding-lexile-measures/

To learn more about Newsela, visit www.newsela.com/about.

The Lexile Framework for Reading

The Lexile® Framework for Reading evaluates reading ability and text complexity on the same developmental scale. Unlike other measurement systems, the Lexile Framework determines reading ability based on actual assessments, rather than generalized age or grade levels. Recognized as the standard for matching readers with texts, tens of millions of students worldwide receive a Lexile measure that helps them find targeted readings from the more than 100 million articles, books and websites that have been measured. Lexile measures connect learners of all ages with resources at the right level of challenge and monitors their progress toward state and national proficiency standards. More information about the Lexile® Framework can be found at www.Lexile.com.