Magna Carta, the Glorious Revolution, and American Democracy

By Trevor Getz
Scholars explaining the roots of the American Revolution often look to centuries of English democratic traditions. Are they right?

Cookie Policy

Our website uses cookies to understand content and feature usage to drive site improvements over time. To learn more, review our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Painting showing a crowd of soldiers in a forest, with a priest leading Charles I to his execution in 1649.

Continuities?

In late 1774, representatives of the American British colonies met. It was the First Continental Congress. Together, these men wrote a Declaration of Rights and Grievances. This document demanded better treatment from Britain. King George III was the king of England at the time. The declaration demanded liberties that were guaranteed by “the English Constitution, and several charters.” These included:

  • freedom from taxation without representation
  • the right to a trial by a jury of peers
  • protection of life, liberty, and property

These phrases were taken from British legal and political documents. They all showed up later in the US Constitution. So, is American democracy based on British ideas of liberty and rights? Let’s look at three important documents and events in British history.

Magna Carta

The 1774 Declaration referred to Britain’s “constitution.” But Britain didn’t have a constitution. Instead, Britain had a number of charters and compacts, or legal agreements. These documents granted certain rights to the population.

Photo of an open gold case with an engraving, two gold coins, and a glass sheet with gold text standing perpendicular.
A copy of the Magna Carta on display at the US Capitol building. Although an English document, it has been celebrated as a step on the way to American democracy. © Getty Images.

 

The first of these documents was the Magna Carta. It was signed by King John on June 15, 1215. A group of nobles forced him to sign it.

The Magna Carta guaranteed certain rights and freedoms. These were given mostly to the nobles. It also made some reforms, or changes. These reforms limited the taxes that nobles could be forced to pay. They also guaranteed the nobles fair treatment in a court trial.

Sound familiar? This is exactly the kind of stuff you find in the US Constitution and Bill of Rights.

Note these comparisons:

 

Magna Carta

US Constitution

Paragraph 34 of the Magna Carta: “The writ … shall not in the future be issued … if a free man could thereby be deprived of the right of trial in his own lord’s court.

US Constitution, Sixth Amendment: “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial … [in] the state or district wherein the crime shall have been committed which district shall have been ascertained by law …”

Paragraph 52 of the Magna Carta: “To any man who we have deprived … of lands, castles, liberties or rights without the lawful judgments of his equals, we will at once restore these.”

US Constitution, Sixth Amendment: “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a
trial by an impartial jury…”


So, the Magna Carta did influence the founders of the United States. But remember, the Magna Carta only protected important and powerful men.

English Civil War

Cover page of The Declartion and Standard with an engraved image of the Levellers submitting proposals.
Representatives of the Levellers putting their proposals before Parliament. Courtesy of the Bodleian Library, Oxford and Google Books. Public domain.

A second important event in British history was the English Civil War of 1642-1651. A civil war is a conflict within a country. On one side of the conflict, people supported King Charles I. On the other side, people supported the English Parliament. Parliament’s members were partly elected. But, the king was not elected. A war like this, between a king and an elected parliament, can easily be seen as a model for the American War of Independence. After all, it was a fight for democracy.

The English Civil War was also caused by anger over taxes. The taxes had been introduced by the king without the support of Parliament. It was this fact that made many people particularly angry. Years later, colonists would experience the same anger. This would kickstart the American Revolution. (Remember the colonists’ demand that there be “no taxation without representation.”)

The English Civil War gave rise to several groups that were very democratic. One was the Levellers. The Levellers were radical supporters of the Parliamentary side. They called for:

  • rule by the people (a phrase that would come back in the American Revolution)
  • a widespread right to vote
  • religious tolerance

But the Levellers did not win the war. By 1660, Charles I’s son— Charles II—was restored to the throne.

Glorious Revolution

Now for a third important event in English political history: the Glorious Revolution of 1688. This bloodless revolution is often seen as a big influence on the American Revolution. Before the Revolution, Charles II’s son was in power. His name was James II.

The Glorious Revolution took place partly because James II suspended Parliament. He then tried to rule by himself. Unsurprisingly, this move was unpopular with the nobles. They rebelled to take James II off the throne. The rebels put William of Orange and his wife, Mary, on the throne. However, they wanted to limit the new rulers from taking complete power. So, William and Mary had to sign a document in 1689. It was the English Bill of Rights, and it had a lot of similarities to the later American Constitution and Bill of Rights.

Elaborate engraving of the royal court at the ratification of the Bill of Rights by King William and Queen Mary.
The Bill of Rights ratified at the Revolution by King William, and Queen Mary, previous to their Coronation. ©National Portrait Gallery, London.

 

For example:

English Bill of Rights

US Revolution and Constitution

Makes it illegal for the King to institute taxes without the consent of Parliament

American revolutionary cry of no taxation without representation

Provides free elections

US Constitution provides for certain groups of people to elect members of Congress

Freedom of debate and speech, at least in Parliament

First Amendment of the US Bill of Rights guarantees free speech

Makes cruel and unusual punishments illegal

Eighth Amendment of the US Bill of Rights also prohibits cruel and unusual punishments

 

But some argue the Glorious Revolution was not really revolutionary. It was mostly organized by a group of wealthy men. All they did was replace one king with another.

Limitations of the argument

One could argue that there was no real tradition of democracy in England. The Magna Carta only protected the nobles. The English Civil War ended with the return of a king. The English Bill of Rights was very limited.

British political thinkers who most inspired the Americans were also not in power. In Britain, their work was not widely read. However, these thinkers were very popular in the American colonies. The writings of Thomas Paine and other American rebels drew on their ideas.

Why were these ideas so popular in the American colonies? Unlike England, the colonies had many people who owned land. Also, the colonies were far away from the British government. They had to make decisions on their own, and many elected local governments. Finally, many different religious groups lived together in the colonies. All this made the ideas of the radical writers very appealing.

This isn’t to say that the British legal and political tradition wasn’t important to the American Revolution. It was. It’s just that the thinkers who had the most influence on American laws were not powerful in Britain.

Sources

Bailyn, Bernard. The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution. Boston: Harvard University Press, 1992.

Magna Carta: Muse and Mentor, Library of Congress Exhibition, November 6, 2014-January 19, 2015. Accessed May 24, 2020, https://www.loc.gov/exhibits/magna-carta-muse-and-mentor/magna-carta-and-the-us-constitution.html

Trevor Getz

Trevor Getz is a professor of African and world history at San Francisco State University. He has been the author or editor of 11 books, including the award-winning graphic history Abina and the Important Men, and has coproduced several prize-winning documentaries. Trevor is also the author of A Primer for Teaching African History, which explores questions about how we should teach the history of Africa in high school and university classes. Bennett Sherry holds a PhD in History from the University of Pittsburgh and has undergraduate teaching experience in world history, human rights, and the Middle East at the University of Pittsburgh and the University of Maine at Augusta. Additionally, he is a Research Associate at Pitt’s World History Center. Bennett writes about refugees and international organizations in the twentieth century.

Image credits

Creative Commons This work is licensed under CC BY 4.0 except for the following:

Cover image: Charles I on his way to be executed, 1649. © Culture Club / Getty Images.

A copy of the Magna Carta on display at the US Capitol building. Although an English document, it has been celebrated as a step on the way to American democracy. © Molly Riley / Getty Images for ANOC.

Representatives of the Levellers putting their proposals before Parliament. Bodleian Library, Oxford and Google Books. Public domain. https://books.google.com/books?id=jOdbAAAAQAAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false

The Bill of Rights ratified at the Revolution by King William, and Queen Mary, previous to their Coronation. © National Portrait Gallery, London.


Newsela

Articles leveled by Newsela have been adjusted along several dimensions of text complexity including sentence structure, vocabulary and organization. The number followed by L indicates the Lexile measure of the article. For more information on Lexile measures and how they correspond to grade levels: www.lexile.com/educators/understanding-lexile-measures/

To learn more about Newsela, visit www.newsela.com/about.

The Lexile Framework for Reading

The Lexile® Framework for Reading evaluates reading ability and text complexity on the same developmental scale. Unlike other measurement systems, the Lexile Framework determines reading ability based on actual assessments, rather than generalized age or grade levels. Recognized as the standard for matching readers with texts, tens of millions of students worldwide receive a Lexile measure that helps them find targeted readings from the more than 100 million articles, books and websites that have been measured. Lexile measures connect learners of all ages with resources at the right level of challenge and monitors their progress toward state and national proficiency standards. More information about the Lexile® Framework can be found at www.Lexile.com.