Cookie Policy

Our website uses cookies to understand content and feature usage to drive site improvements over time. To learn more, review our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

OER Logo

Evidence Detective

Page 1 of 5
Checkmark Alert Banner
Did you know? You can access an editable version of this activity: Google Doc or Word Doc
OER PROJECT: BIG HISTORY/ LESSON 2.6ACTIVITYEVIDENCEDETECTIVEUnless otherwise noted, this work is licensed under CC BY 4.0. Credit: “EvidenceDetective,” OER Project, https://www.oerproject.com/1PurposeScientists haven’t always agreed about how our planet works. By investigating different types of evidence, you’ll figure out why ideas about Earth’s processes changed over time, and what kinds of evidence are most convincing. Process1.Read the driving question and inquiry challenge:a.Driving question: Why did scientists eventually accept new ideas about Earth’s processes, even when earlier scientists had different theories?b.Inquiry challenge: You are an evidence detective. Your job is to figure out what kinds of evidence helped scientists change their minds, and which pieces of evidence were the most convincing. 2.Make a predictionbefore you analyze the evidence. What do you think matters most when scientists decide to accept a new idea? Put a check by one of the options in the table below,and then write one or two sentences explaining your prediction.OptionYour choice(check one)ExplanationTechnologyEvidenceThe reputation of the scientistSomething else(write it below)_______________
OER PROJECT: BIG HISTORY/ LESSON 2.6ACTIVITYEVIDENCEDETECTIVE23.Investigateeachpiece of evidencein the table below and complete the rest of the table. This will help you think about how you’ll answer the driving question.EvidenceWhat does this evidence show?What question could this evidence help answer?How convincing is this evidence? Why?Citation: Map of Pangaea, c. 200 million years ago.By Fama Clamosa, CC BY-SA 4.0.Citation: The Alvin,launched in 1964,was the first deep-sea submersible used to take pictures of the ocean floor.Image courtesyWoods Hole Oceanographic Institution.
OER PROJECT: BIG HISTORY/ LESSON 2.6ACTIVITYEVIDENCEDETECTIVE3EvidenceWhat does this evidence show?What question could this evidence help answer?How convincing is this evidence? Why?Citation: Heinrich C. Berann, “World Ocean Floor,” data from manuscript by Bruce C. Heezen and Marie Tharp, Library of Congress Geography and Map Division, 1977, public domain.Citation: Fossil of a lystrosaurus, an extinct lizard. These fossils have been found in Africa, Asia, and Antarctica.Natural History Museum of the University of Zurich, Switzerland. By Rama, CC BY-SA 2.0 fr.
OER PROJECT: BIG HISTORY/ LESSON 2.6ACTIVITYEVIDENCEDETECTIVE44.Now look across all of the evidenceto compare and evaluate. Answer the questions below.a.Which piece of evidence seems the strongest? Why?b.Which piece of evidence seems the least convincing? Why?5.Different scientific disciplines use different tools and methods. Choose one or two disciplines and circle your selections.•Chemistry•Environmental science•Geology•Oceanography6.Answer the questions below based on the disciplines you selected.You can use the Disciplines Chartto help you understand the types of questions and evidence used by each of these disciplines.a.How would this discipline investigate the piece of evidence you chose as the strongest in question 4a?b.What new or different types of evidence could this discipline provide?
OER PROJECT: BIG HISTORY/ LESSON 2.6ACTIVITYEVIDENCEDETECTIVE5c.How might this new discipline make scientists more confident in the evidence?7.Solve the case!Write a four-or five-sentence response that answers the drivingquestion: Why did scientists eventually accept new ideas about Earth’s processes, even when earlier scientists had different theories?