Cookie Policy

Our website uses cookies to understand content and feature usage to drive site improvements over time. To learn more, review our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Skip Navigation
OER Logo

Comparison: Networks of Exchange Feedback Form

Page 1 of 1
Checkmark Alert Banner
Did you know? You can access an editable version of this activity: Google Doc or Word Doc
WORLD HISTORY AP/ LESSON 2.4ACTIVITYCOMPARISON: NETWORKS OF EXCHANGE FEEDBACK FORMUnless otherwise noted, this work is licensed under CC BY 4.0. Credit: “WH ComparisonFeedback Form”, OER Project, https://www.oerproject.com/Direc&ons: Check the criteria met for each category and leave notes for your students specifying what they did well and what they can doto improve. Any grayed-out areas will not be evaluated as part of this ac<vity.Similari'esNo similari=es between historical events, developments, regions, eras, or any other important area were iden=fied.Similari=es between historical events, developments, regions, eras, or any other important area were iden'fied.Similari=es between historical events, developments, regions, eras, or any other important area were described.A brief analysis of the reasons for the similari=es was provided.An extended analysis of the reasons for the similari=es was provided.NotesDifferencesNo differences between historical events, developments, regions, eras, or any other important area were iden=fied.Differences between historical events, developments, regions, eras, or any other important area were iden'fied.Differences between historical events, developments, regions, eras, or any other important area were described.A brief analysis of the reasons for the differences was provided.An extended analysis of the reasons for the differences was provided.NotesHistorical SignificanceNo explana=on of historical significance provided.AOempts but does not fully explain how the similari=es/differences are historically significant in terms of amount, depth, and/or endurance.*Fully explains how the similari=es/differences are historically significant in terms of amount, depth, and/or endurance.*NotesHistorical accuracyIncorrectly refers to historical content and may include misconcep=ons of that content.There are many minor errors or a major error in applying historical content.Uses many unsupported opinions.Avoids explicit misconcep=ons of the content.May make an occasional minor error in applying historical content.Uses some unsupported opinions.Avoids misconcep=ons.There are no errors in applying historical content.Avoids using unsupported opinions.Notes* Amount: How many people’s lives were affected by the similarity/difference? Depth: Were people living in the <me period being studied deeply affected by the similarity/difference? Endurance: Were the changes people experienced as a result of this similarity/difference long-las<ng and/or recurring?